Finally, the Clinton Email Case Will Be Reopened – What Happens to Comey’s Files?

May 12, 2017

Mr. Andrew McCabe, Acting FBI Director has given the go ahead for the Clinton email case to be reopened. A special prosecutor will not be used. This will most likely take quite awhile as they go over evidence, there are a lot of emails!

Proof of the reopening [VIDEO] HERE

Hillary Clinton and her cronies should be very worried. She knew exactly what she was doing was wrong. Remember she was a criminal attorney, she knew better.

Rest assured folks, all Comey’s files, computer correspondence, all of it is under protection, they have secured all his files. Under the Criminal Justice Information Services policy, Comey’s access would have been immediately terminated.

All his clearances, everything has been pulled on him, he’s just another citizen like the rest of us.

Bradley Moss who is a National Security lawyer, was asked what would happen to any of the files of Comey’s. Here is what he replied:

“All paper classified files in Director’s office should be cross-checked against inventory lists to ensure they’re all present and accounted for,” he said. “E-mail accounts and individual hard drives should be archived. In theory, his staff is supposed to immediately do it. In case he was traveling with a classified lock bag, they need to know what’s missing from his office to know what needs to be recovered. In reality? It could take days. [Comey] can be allowed access back into his office but only after it’s been sanitized of classified files.”

So, let’s hope the process goes through without a hitch before he is allowed to return to his office to collect personal items.

Source:

Ex-feds confident Comey’s devices and files are safe, even if FBI won’t confirm

The “Deposit Drain” Is Coming and It’s Not Good

May 11, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

JP Morgan is telling Banks that they had better “partner up,” as a U.S. “Deposit Drain Looms.”

We have been expecting that big bubble to burst. This time it’s going to be much worse than 2008. We won’t be rescued by the big banks this time. After the financial crisis of 2008, our economy was propped up by the Federal Reserve, they are pretty much broke now, keep in mind it’s attached to the German Deutsche Bank, among other failing banks. (Interesting read on this situation Here)

President Trump cannot fix this, he has to plan how to get us out of it once it does occur. The dollar will be completely null and void. Many sites have been trying to get people to prepare with food, gold, silver, water. They are correct in informing people to be aware and act to help themselves. The nations such as China will stop sending goods to this country. Not a good outlook/picture for us. Without money to pay for goods, we are in trouble.

It is thought that we may start feeling the start of the financial crunch in December, 2017. This would be a good idea to have some money stashed –  not in your bank, this would help for only a short term. It would take a little while before the dollar would not help you at all.

Scary to think about a “deposit drain.” Here is an example that was used in explaining how the “deposit is destroyed.” As reported by Bloomberg and presented by JP Morgan titled “Core Deposits Strike Back:” -“illustrates how this process will sap bank deposits using the example of a couple who pays off a mortgage that was bundled with other mortgages and sold to the Fed. Right now, when that couple takes that money out of their bank account for that payment, the Fed uses that cash to buy another mortgage bond, recycling it back into the banking system.”

“A “deposit is destroyed” if the “Fed does not reinvest,” the presentation states.”

“JPMorgan estimates that a quantitative easing-related deposit-drain could result in loan growth lagging deposit growth by $200 billion to $300 billion a year.”

This in my opinion is definitely a deep state, from the playbook event that makes you wonder, is this part of why they are pushing the EU? This will not only affect America, but across the pond also.

As reported by mishtalk.com on April 29, 2017, “Nearly Every Regional Bank Missed Lending Estimate:”

“Bank stocks have climbed since Donald Trump was elected president as investors bet his pro-growth agenda and rising interest rates would help lenders generate huge profits. But this month, executives at some of the country’s largest regional banks said customers, especially corporations and small businesses, are instead waiting for details on the new administration’s proposals and results before seeking financing for expansion.”


“Total loans at the 15 largest U.S. regional banks declined by about $10 billion to $1.73 trillion in the first quarter, compared with the previous three-month period, the first such drop in four years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. All but two of those banks missed analysts’ estimates for total loans, as a slump in commercial and industrial lending sapped growth.”


“The optimism and the willingness is there, but it has not yet translated into actions or behaviors,” Beth Mooney, chief executive officer of KeyCorp, said of the Cleveland-based bank’s small and middle-market business clients. “We did not see ‘flip the switch’ sort of behavior that led to loan demand or making different capital decisions or investment decisions.”

So, we definitely see something with borrowing, investing that still doesn’t look good. X 22 Report, which I have sourced at the bottom has almost a whole page which lists condos and the likes being bought up by speculators, but they can’t resell them! They are dead in the water, not moving!! Now, we have a big real estate slump, reminicient of 2008. 

President Trump has met with several foreign dignitaries in the last month, most of them were from Asian countries. I wondered myself what is Trump doing? Does his meetings have to do with only North Korea? Yes, it has to do with them, but maybe not in the way our deep state would like you to believe. The deep state would just love to push war with Korea, Russia. But, Trump is not going to let that happen. He knows our economy is getting ready to collapse. He maybe trying to figure how to keep us independent from the deep state and other countries that are economically collapsing as they are tied to the Central Banks, Federal Reserve. He has signaled that the economy will not hit that 3.0% GDP mark.  He knows that the deep state will never die off as long as they and the central banks have a never ending supply of the almighty dollar. Now, if the economy collapses, which it looks like it will, this will definitely bring the deep state to its knees. That’s why the deep state, which are even comprised of some Republicans are losing their cool, wanting to impeach our President, continuing to push the Russian collusion scenario. 

Now why has he met with all the Asian dignitaries? After the firing of Comey our President met with the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov. They most likely talked about Syria, cooperation in ending ISIS, trying to build a better relationship with Russia. After all we are not suppose to be in a Cold War with Russia since Reagan’s era, like the deep state would have you believe. Soon after, Trump met with Kissinger, most likely he told him what is happening with the economy and reinforcing to him that the deep state is done.

The new South Korean President Moon-Jae has signaled they want to smooth over tensions with the U.S. and North Korea. Even to go as far as saying he wants to meet with Kim Jung Un. This is good, it will possibly open an avenue with China, and their “Silk Road,” nicknamed One Belt, One Road. Actually X 22 Report has reported that China wants to extend an invitation for them to join the Silk Road. This would definitely help the very poor North Koreans. As reported by Reuters on May, 9, 2017, North Korea will be sending a delegation to the Silk Road Summit. There will be one western nation attending also, but none of the articles I have read are disclosing who the Wstern nation is.

Bloomberg reported in November 2015, about the Silk Road and what it means for their neighboring countries:

“China’s plan is to construct roads, railways, ports, and other infrastructure across Asia and beyond to bind its economy more tightly to the rest of the world. The scheme was honored with a prominent place in the country’s latest five-year plan, released in late October, and has become a favorite subject of top leaders, who sell it as an international initiative to foster peace and prosperity. The program will “answer the call of our time for regional and global cooperation,” President Xi Jinping proclaimed during a speech at the Boao Forum in March.”


Last December, 2014 the country inaugurated a $40 billion Silk Road Fund to invest in One Belt, One Road projects. China’s state banks are already lending big to countries along the new routes. The expansion of China-backed finance could propel Beijing’s quest for greater international stature for the renminbi, which it’s promoting as a global reserve currency.

If and when we do economically collapse what will be our new currency? Would we join the Silk Road too? Well, some people think we will. Only time will tell, but it sure is interesting to see our President meeting with all those diplomats within such a short span of time. I think something really big is about to go down.

This [VIDEO] is an interesting video by the X-22 Report, titled, The Plan Has Been Revealed and Everyone Needs to Brace for the Impact, Episode 1276B

This [VIDEO] interesting to watch – Belt and Road forum for International cooperation will be held in Beijing on May 14  – 15 

Excellent read about USA possible participation in the Belt and Road Forum, its open to many nations – https://larouchepac.com/20170313/us-must-play-its-part-belt-and-road-symphony

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-08/jpmorgan-tells-banks-to-partner-up-as-u-s-deposit-drain-looms
Regional Lender Loan Crash: Nearly Every Major Regional Bank Missed Lending Estimate
http://x22report.com/the-plan-has-been-revealed-and-everyone-needs-to-brace-for-the-impact-episode-1276/

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1850VH

Hillary Clinton Email Case MUST BE REOPENED!

May 10, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

No doubt about Comey protecting and obstructing justice. His firing by our President has nothing to do with Trump, Russia investigation. I believe the Trump administration gave Comey enough rope, so to speak, to hang himself, before firing him. Trump was advised by both Sessions and Rodenstein to fire Comey.

Right now the most important case that congress should be looking into is Hillary Clinton’s obstruction of justice, as well as Comey’s. I have never witnessed such bungling, incompetence of a case in my life! Obama and Lynch are also part of this monstrosity of injustice.

The very few Congressman and Senators who support Hillary Clinton need to realize, wake up to the facts about her. Why are they not realizing that if the filth about Hillary Clinton had not come out, we truly would have another Hitler in power. We would never have forgotten her email fiasco, therefore no trust in the President, had she become President.

These representatives who still support her are not true Americans. They don’t want to hear the truth, they can’t handle the truth. They most likely, in my opinion, are just like her, corrupt and dishonest. How much more do we as Americans not know about these representatives who support her?

We were told early on that there were several cell phones of Hillary Clinton’s that were destroyed with a hammer, missing SIM cards… This all complicated the procedure when trying to get concrete evidence/proof of intention and a just ruling.

Judicial Watch has obtained new email records from State Department documents with 29 new email exchanges which were never before released to investigators. These emails are further proof that Huma Abedin herself sent classified material as well as detailed daily schedules about Clinton to Clinton Foundation officials, through her unsecured clintonemail.com account. Why would Clinton Foundation officials need to know where Clinton was at all times?

Judicial Watch also writes/reports:


“The emails show classified information was sent through the clintonemail.com account:”

“In a December 21, 2009, email, Clinton top national security and foreign policy staffer Jake Sullivan forwarded an email to Clinton’s unsecured email account containing classified information heavily redacted under FOIA exemption B1.4(D) – “Information specifically authorized by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy … Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources.” Clinton thenforwarded the email, concerning the climate change accord, from her unsecured email account to Abedin’s unsecured email account with the message, “Pls print.”

“And, on December 24, 2009,Clinton sent an unsecured email from HDR22@clintonmail.com to then-Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson. The classified email, asking Carson to “Pls review the memcon of my call w [French] FM Kouchener [Redacted].” Information in this message was blacked out using FOIA exemptions B1.4(B) – “Foreign government information” and (D).”

It seems more and more is being uncovered, more emails, more unsecured ways that information was sent. Comey and Lynch should never have closed this investigation. This shows complicity in helping to cover up the ensuing investigation
Hillary had said that she had turned over all emails, as far as she knew…..sorry, caught again! I believe people went through those emails and hand picked ones that were to be turned over, omitting ones they didn’t want turned over, and if so, are just as guilty as Clinton. She could of hand picked them since there was an amount of time that passed from being told to turn emails back over to the State Department, and when she actually did turn it over. If you remember these emails had documents about Benghazi in them as well. So, when a subpoena was produced for Benghazi documents, David Kendall, one of Clinton’s attorneys informed the committee that Clinton’s emails from her time at the State Department had been permanently erased.

Also during the time the investigative committee was trying to get these emails, Clinton had asked for a two week extension, which they gave her.

As reported by Politico, “After seeking and receiving a two week extension from the Committee, Secretary Clinton failed to provide a single new document to the subpoena issued by the Committee and refused to provide her private server to the Inspector General for the State Department or any other independent arbiter for analysis,” Gowdy said.

Was she buying time? I think so

Also, may I remind everyone that AP reported on 6/22/2016, that the State Department was having such technical problems with Hillary’s at home server, they temporarily disabled security features on the government’s own system!! This information came out in emails that were released. So, what information was possibly hacked inside of the State Department when this was done?

Comey also stated that intent would have to be proved to find Hillary guilty of any charges. Seems like Comey was trying to rewrite the law. According to Dr. Gorka, who is Deputy Assistant to the President, “intent is irrelevant.”

Under “strict liability” there need not be proof of intent. “strict liability” definition

Who ever in the House or Senate thinks Comey’s termination was caused by the Trump, Russia investigation, GET A GRIP! He deserved to be fired!



Read More>

INTENT IS IRRELEVANT IN CLINTON’S EMAIL CASE: WATCH [VIDEO] FOX AND DR GORKA


DNA Sale For Mothers On Mothers Day – What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

May 8, 2017

Sounds great, at first to know your heritage through DNA testing doesn’t it? But, what can be done with all the information they glean from the test?

There is a lot of information about your genes from just a cheek swab. Whether it is from blood or cheek swab, they retrieve the same information about your DNA.

Today, Geni is sending out e-mails for Mothers Day, stating they have a sale going on for Mothers for Mothers Day. I just received mine today.


Anything and I mean anything is always able to be shared to third parties. Take for instance Google, FaceBook. They collect a lot of data on individuals. They say they don’t share it, but it’s not unhackable. What if insurance companies were able to get the information? Could it mean higher deductibles, premiums for an individual? Think about it, that’s all I have to say about it, just think about it.

23andme which is another testing site, warns on their website, according to Nature America, Inc., ” Genetic Information that you share with others could be used against your interests. You should be careful about sharing your Genetic Information with others.”

So, if you get one of these emails, just be warned before proceeding.

To all the Mom’s out there, I wish for you a wonderful, blessed Mothers Day.

Source:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/

Bloomberg Writer – Why Hillary Clinton Bombed at the Polls

May 8, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

This following article is an opinion written by Leonid Bershidsky for Bloomberg. I don’t agree with some of the statements, such as Germany and France having more qualified informational services available to them. Hey, we all have the same internet! But, anyway its right on that we didn’t vote for Hillary because she lies, cheats…..

__________________________________________________

Why Macron Won and Clinton Lost

Internet-based dirty tricks only work against voters willing to be misled and weak candidates.

By Leonid Bershidsky

Hillary Clinton blames her electoral defeat, in part, on what she has called “Russian WikiLeaks” which “raised doubts” in the minds of her likely supporters and “scared them off.” Yet the very same arsenal — bots, fake news, hacking — was used against Emmanuel Macron — and he still won the French presidential election against his populist rival by a two-thirds vote.

The internet-based election disruption toolkit is familiar by now. A network of social media accounts, both real and bot-run, agitates for a populist candidate and against his or her centrist rival, posting and reporting memes and stories that are often fake but believable to people in a certain filter bubble. At the same time, hackers launch phishing attacks against the centrist candidate’s campaign and then leak their spoils, helped by the same activist-and-bot network. This is what happened in the U.S. in 2016 and in France in 2017. In both countries, the campaigns were blamed on Russia, because they were run against the candidates who were relatively hostile to Russia.

The use of the toolkit in the French campaign has been well-documented by cybersecurity experts and fact-checkers.

The Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, for example, described Marine Le Pen’s “online army” on Twitter. A cluster of key accounts launched a hashtag with a barrage of simultaneous posts. The accounts retweeted each other, then an “amplification network” including automated accounts (bots) picked up the tweets and tried to spread them further. In some cases, this approach succeeded in lifting the hashtags into Twitter’s top trends. But, the DFLR noted: 

There is no evidence to suggest that any of the hashtags studied here spread significantly beyond the community of Le Pen’s online supporters. They did make it into the overall trending lists, but they did not become self-sustaining trends. Instead, they faded away within a few hours.


The U.S. alt-right community, perhaps empowered by claims in the news media that they helped elect Trump, tried to help, but was largely defeated by the language barrier; Pepe the Frog, the alt-right symbol, didn’t quite resonate with French voters.  


The U.S. alt-right community, perhaps empowered by claims in the news media that they helped elect Trump, tried to help, but was largely defeated by the language barrier; Pepe the Frog, the alt-right symbol, didn’t quite resonate with French voters.

Pro-Le Pen accounts, both French and foreign ones, as well as accounts supporting far-left candidates such as Jean-Luc Melenchon, tried to spread narratives countering those of traditional media. A study by the social networking consultancy Bakamo, published in April, found that about 24 percent of all election-related links that have been shared in France pursued this goal. A significant share of these links were from Russian state propaganda sources, such as RT and Sputnik, accused by the Macron campaign of spreading fake news.

Those who posted these links were more prolific and engaged than those who cited traditional news stories. But the latter made up 56 percent of the shared links. The reframing of media narratives and the fakes — tracked rigorously by platforms such as CrossCheck and the daily Le Monde’s Les Decodeurs — failed to sway a significant number of voters.

An Oxford University study published in late April concluded that “the people discussing French and German politics over social media tend to use more high quality information sources than those discussing US politics.” The conversation, according to the study, is “less poisoned” in France than in the U.S., and less of the content was being spread using bots. The Oxford researchers, like Bakamo, noted that twice as many election-related links reposted by French users led to quality news stories as to various junk and fakes. In the U.S. last year, the ratio was almost 1-to-1.

Perhaps the most dangerous fake — “documents” about Macron’s offshore account which surfaced between the rounds of voting — was quickly and convincingly debunked; it did no damage.

Hackers, too, failed to influence the French election’s outcome. Before the first round of voting, there was a real chance Macron would be eliminated if compromising information about him came to light; that’s what happened to the early favorite, conservative candidate Francois Fillon. But no spectacular stolen data about Macron was published anywhere while he was vulnerable. Only last Friday, just before the French media and both candidates went into the legally mandated quiet period, hackers released a trove of stolen emails from Macron associates and campaign officials.

The timing is curious. The French media and bloggers could do nothing with the data because, as the government promptly warned them, they could be prosecuted for violating the quiet period. But apparently whoever compiled and released the trove (an employee of a Russian government’s IT contractor? Someone with an email address on a German public email service? A group that includes these and other people?) hadn’t found anything interesting in it. Two days of frantic efforts to unearth juicy tidbits from it produced no results for WikiLeaks or the foreign reporters who were not bound by the media blackout. All that pro-Le Pen diggers managed to find was a clearly humorously meant “Je baise le peuple” (“screw the people”) at the end of an email by a Macron campaign staffer.

The release will be scrutinized post-election, and maybe some minor transgressions or missteps will be highlighted. But that won’t change the outcome or, judging by what I’ve seen of the stolen data, make Macron’s life any more difficult as president. The hapless hackers must have hoped to create confusion and an atmosphere of suspicion on election day. Macron won anyway by a wider margin than polls had predicted.

To sum this up:

The pro-Le Pen campaign on the social networks failed to travel beyond Le Pen’s base, which was more clearly defined than Donald Trump’s in the U.S. since Le Pen was far more of a known political quantity;

The spread of fakes was thwarted by French voters’ relative sophistication compared with American ones;

Unlike in the U.S., the centrist candidate’s campaign had little to hide — or had the good sense not to put sensitive material online. 
Clinton didn’t lose because the internet-based toolkit was used against her. She lost because a sizable number of Americans did not consider her trustworthy. So they easily accepted both the fake news about her and the hints of corruption and dishonesty contained in the leaked emails. 
Months of postmortems of Clinton’s loss to Trump overshadow one of the simplest explanations: It’s important to convince voters that you are not corrupt. Macron also benefited from voters who refused to give Le Pen a free pass on her party’s history of racism and xenophobia the way Americans let Trump get away with his inflammatory statements.
Clinton rejoiced at Macron’s victory and what she called a “defeat to those interfering with democracy.” Democracy, however, includes a long history of dirty campaigning. The internet toolkit — call it Russian, alt-right or by any other name — is far from a superweapon. It’s merely a collection of dirty techniques based on modern delivery methods. These methods are not a silver bullet. A country with a healthy political culture and engaged voters can reject them. It’s not for nothing that in France, Sunday’s turnout of 74.56 percent counted as relatively low, while in the U.S. it would have been the highest since 1896.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.




Leonoid Bershidsky’s Article: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-05-08/why-macron-won-and-clinton-lost

Richard Chambers This is The Syrian Flag…

May 8, 2017

Paul Watson, [@PrisonPlanet], has family that live in Paris. He would be the first one to trust talking with when it comes to what exactly is going on over there after the election of Emanuel Macron.

Richard Chambers, I assume thinks that the green, white and black flag is the official Syrian flag, because he basically called Paul a liar. Well, first of all Richard, Apple even knows what color the Syrian flag is, it’s not green, white, black. Syria🇸🇾 

This is the picture that is in question between Paul and Richard, as shown in Richard’s tweet:


Distinction of the Syrian Flags:

We do have to remember that the Syrian revolution was actually hijacked by ISIS. The revolution actually started out as peaceful until it was hijacked. There flag was green, white, black.


This excerpt comes from the syrianobserver.com, after the killing of Father Paolo:

“There is little difference whether the ISIS killed Father Paolo at the orders of the Assad regime or at the orders of Al-Qaeda commanders. In both cases, the Syrian revolution has changed its face and its mission. The fact remains the same: the Syrian revolution, which started as a democratic uprising against totalitarianism, inequality, and poverty, has ended up killing the very people who defended the revolution and called for Assad to depart.”

I guess when most people see the green, white and black flag, they attribute it to ISIS. Although ISIS has its own flag:


According to independent.co.uk, the writing on the above flag mean:

“The white banner at the top of the flag reads: “There is no god but Allah [God]. Mohammad is the messenger of Allah.” This phrase is a declaration of faith used across Islam, and is known as the shahada.”
“Underneath is a white circle emblazoned with black writing reading “Mohammed is the messenger of God”, which is meant to resemble the Prophet’s seal, similar to that used to close an envelope.”

The below video is from Infowars, Paul Watson speaking about the Syrian Flag that was caught on video at Macron’s rally:

Sources:

http://www.syrianobserver.com/EN/Features/25503/Weekend+Has+the+Syrian+Revolution+Been+Hijacked+by+Islamists

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-flag-what-do-the-words-mean-and-what-are-its-origins-10369601.html

Obama Will Be Remembered For Trying To Take American Guns Away

Obama wants to be remembered for his achievements. Every President has a legacy that is not perfect. But, Obama went way overboard by letting a staging of a school shooting tear at American’s heartstrings. It did upset me very much when I heard about Sandy Hook.

I wondered at the time why are there so many of these shootings happening? It just didn’t make sense. Never before in history had this happened, especially under the same Presidential watch.

After I saw this video I was shocked because it is so accurate, the comparisons, everything….this shooting never actually happened.

People that were involved with the making of the staged event should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. They knew what they were doing, they knew it was a lie.

Obama is a co-conspirator of this, he must be. It was staged to brainwash the American people into thinking, we have to get rid of the guns.

I believe it was Alex Jones from Infowars that first exposed this Sandy Hook staging. He was right. Don’t take my word for it, watch the video, then download it and share it with friends, family. Let’s get the message out there.

Paris Climate Change Agreement Talks

May 8, 2017

Ivanka Trump has been selected by her father to head the review of the U.S. role in the Paris Climate Change Agreement.

According to Breitbart, both Ivanka and Jared Kushner and Rex Tillerson have urged Trump to stay in the agreement.

This comes around the time of deep divisions in the Trump administration over the “carbon cutting agreement.”

There was a time Trump called climate change a hoax perpetrated by China, promising to cancel the deal.

A State Department official has told the Associated Press, “The decision to participate in next week’s U.N. climate talks shouldn’t be construed as a sign that Trump has decided to stay in the Paris pact.”

There are now 144 parties out of 197 that have ratified the agreement already. You can go to unfccc.int to find out who the participants are and who has ratified the agreement.

Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/07/ivanka-trump-to-head-review-of-u-s-role-in-paris-climate-change-agreement/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner

http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9444.php

Seems Hillary Clinton Stole Money From Russian Banks For Election 2016

May 8, 2017

The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation have found that Hillary Clinton and the DNC have now been implicated in the theft of tens of millions of rubles from a now failed bank in Tatarstan. In a last ditch effort to hide these crimes they stole another $60 Million from Irish investors too.

In 2013 when she was looking to make a run for the Presidential seat, she masterfully planned the Uranium deal with ROSATOM (Russian State Owned Energy Giant), they only had to pay the Clinton’s $3 Million. 

One of the Russian banks frequently used by Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton, and her criminal associates, was Tatfondbank and its smaller affiliated Intekhbank PJSC—both located in Tatarstan.

“The Central Bank of Russia made an initial investigation into banks located in Tatarstan—but whom immediately came under “extreme” pressure to limit this investigation by the American super-lobbyist Tony Podesta (brother of Hillary Clinton’s national presidential campaign manager John Podesta) who “promised/devoted” that upon Hillary Clinton taking office once she won the presidency, all Western sanctions against Russian banks would be lifted.” Wow, this is definitely Russian ties and more!!

Those who were arrested were; Robert Musin who was the Chairman of the Board of Tatfondbank, Ramil Nasyrov the ex-First Deputy Chairman of Tatfondbank and Elena Leushina, Director of Royal Time Group Limited Liability Company – their listed partners in crime KPMG, LLP, AECOM and Steelman were all discovered to have used stolen Tatfondbank to fund not only Hillary Clinton’s failed U.S. Presidency bid, but other Democratic Party candidates also.

WHERE DID THE MONEY GO?

“From Tatfondbank to Royal Time Group to KPMG LLP: $129,689 given to Hillary Clinton; $100,000 given to host the Democratic Party Convention; over $50,000 given to US Democratic Party Senator Chuck Schumer; nearly $40,000 to the Democrat Party Service Corp; nearly $35,000 to the Democrat Party Congressional Campaign Committee; and over $33,000 to the Democrat Party Senatorial Campaign Committee.”

“From Tatfondbank to Royal Time Group to AECOM: $350,000 to Democrat Party super-PACS Priorities USA Action and Emily’s List; $136,800 to the Democrat Party Service Corp; $63,558 to Hillary Clinton; $26,234 to the Maine Democrat Party State Committee; $25,525 to US Democrat Party Senator Patty Murray; $21,800 to US Democrat Party Senator Chuck Schumer; and $18,632 to the Democrat Party of Virginia.”
“From Tatfondbank to Royal Time Group to Steelman Partners: $28,000 to the Democrat Party.”

“By both the CBR and ICR discovering how easily Hillary Clinton and her criminal Democratic Party accomplices were in manipulating Russian banks in their money laundering scheme, the Federation this month announced it was reversing itself and would now legalize cryptocurrencies in order to protect all banks in the future.”

“As to why Hillary Clinton and her Democrat Party needed to swindle Russian banks in the first place in order to finance themselves, is due to what is being called a “liquidity supernova” erupting in the West that has seen their Central Banks (CB) buying $1 trillion of financial assets just in the first four months of 2017, which amounts to $3.6 trillion annualized and is “the largest CB buying on record.”

“So short of cash is the West, in fact, that since 2014, its Central Banks have had to spend $200 billion per quarter just to keep their markets from crashing—and that continues to this very day as evidenced by the Swiss National Bank boosting its total equity holdings to an all time high of $80.4 billion, up $17 billion from the $63.4 billion at the end of 2016, the biggest quarterly increase in its history.”

 
With America, too, suffering through what is being called the worst “retail apocalypse” in its entire history, that is now seeing even its most valued tech workers living in their vehicles in the shadows of its Silicon Valley tech giants.  This nation remains in denial about Hillary Clinton and her Democratic Party crimes, choosing instead to believe that Russia is their dire enemy. When nothing could be further from the truth—and as to how these peoples have ever come to believe that Russia’s paltry 143 million citizens would ever want to conquer the nearly 330 million peoples in the United States and their nearly 800 million European Union allies bespeaks more about the destructive power of their leftist-communist propaganda mainstream media than what reality actually is, or even could be.

Source:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2296.htm

French Election Fraud – Alexia Thomas

May 8, 2017

As reported by WETINHAPPEN MAGAZINE:

​”FRANCE ELECTION 2017 IS A FRAUD, RIGGED BY EUROPEAN UNION MASTERS OF DECEIT;”

“It Must Be Annulled – Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas Demands”

“On behalf of the People of France, the Voice of France, France Democracy, French People, I Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas watching with an Independent Eye, says ‘THE CLARION OF FRANCE CANNOT BE SUBDUED’. —- Candidate Marie Le Pen was Robbed of her Votes. Candidate Emmanuel Macron’s Votes is a Fraud as the French People have not Voted, instead European Union Citizens voted and Migrants voted and the European Union Masters of Deceit, encroached in the Sovereignty of France. So, We the People of United Kingdom do not agree and we do not recognize Candidate Emmanuel Macron as the France to be President of 2017.”
“Vote By Democracy Is Count Of The Majority And Unidentified Majority Will Mean The France General Election Is a Sham, Rigged To Subdue France Independence As A Sovereign Republic. — By Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas”

“France and Borders of the United Kingdom are in close proximity and our United Kingdom Government departure from European Union and Candidate Emmanuel Macron being a Pro-EU will jeopardize the British Peoples Security in that Candidate Emmanuel Macron will allow EU Terrorists to penetrate the UK Borders from the Port of Carley from France.”

“Candidate Marie Le Pen is the Victor and stands for the Virtues of France and her postulation is France a Government of her own. The French Government must cancel the Election within the next 48 hours and without delay and further hesitation, Recall a New Election in that no EU Citizen is allowed to Vote and only Migrants with French Passports can Partake in the Vote, hence the General Election of 2017 is about France Democracy and Her Independence.”

“I, Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas say to the People of France, the France Election of 2017 is not Democracy, Rather it is a Mediocrity, a Disgrace to French Independence.”

“The European Union, the Masters of Deceit in Crusadership of a failed ideology as jokers of Europe Rigged the French Election of 2017; Therefore, Emmanuel Macron’s Mandate Must not Stand.”

“Candidate Marie Le Pen is an Anti-European Union Crusader who believes in the Full French Democracy and Her Independence against the German Invasion of France in 1937 to Steal their Freedom as a People and their Sovereignty as a Republic;”

“— Conclusively, the French Election of 2017 is a Fraud. It is not the France Mandate but EU Encroachment of French Sovereignty.”
“For this reason, on Behalf of the UK Government, the People of the World, and the Coalition of all Governments of the United Nation and in their Podium, I say We the People of the World, do not agree that Candidate Emmanuel Macron has been Democratically Elected.”

“I, Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas call on all Government of the World to reject French Election of 2017, in that the French Election is a Joke, and not until the Free French People are allowed to vote without the interference of Aliens Invasion of their Votes and Rigging their Election.”
“Candidate Marie Le Pen is the French Peoples choice.”

“Candidate Emmanuel Macron is inexperienced. So, the Incumbent France Government must now nullify the Election, or else be ready to destroy the Great Republic of France.”

“I, Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas say to Candidate Marie Le Pen, she can not concede to Defeat an Oversight, an Error that Steals the French Peoples Honour.”
“The Republic of France has no place for Candidate Emmanuel Macron because France is not a Kitchen but the Land of Strength.”

“I, Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas say to the French Parliament they must not Succumb to Unconstitutional Power Transfer to Candidate Emmanuel Macron and equally say to the Incumbent President not to Signature the Transfer of Power to Candidate Emmanuel Macron.”

“The French Election of 2017 is a Robbery against the Republic of France, and the French People, instead it recalls the Memory of France Destruction of 1935 after the German Invasion of their Territory to Rule them by Tyranny.”

“The Government of France must Wake Up for the Future of Today or be ready for the death of Tomorrow. The France Election of 2017 is a Fraud and cannot Stand.”
“It must be Revoked and Annulled, as it is not the French Peoples Mandate but the European Union in her Monstrousity unconstitutionally Rigged the French Election.”

“Principle Without Emotion Is Not Cruelty, But The Act To Embrace Emotion Is The Destruction Of Self-Determinism; It’s A Me, Do Or Die Affair. — By Her Knowledgeable Prof. Alexia Thomas”

“I, Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas rest my Case and ask the French Government and her People to do what is Good for France.”
“Candidate Emmanuel Macron cannot be French President for 2017.”
“Press Release By Her Knowledgeable Professor Alexia Thomas – Chairman of The Commonwealth Liberation Party and Chieftain of The Commonwealth Treaty Alliance Commission.”

Alexia Thomas 

As reported by frenchentree.com, “If you are a EU citizen and a resident in France (primary residents only), you have voting rights in France for both European elections and local communal elections, but you do not have the right to vote in national elections. You cannot have voting rights in more than one country (i.e. both the UK and in France for European elections).”

UPDATE: France’s presidential voting watchdog has called on the Interior Ministry to look into claims by the campaign of far-right presidential candidate Marine Le Pen that ballot papers are being tampered with nationwide to benefit her rival, centrist Emmanuel Macron.

Source:

http://www.wetinhappen.com.ng/%E2%80%8Bfrance-election-2017-is-a-fraud-rigged-by-european-union-masters-of-deceit-it-must-be-annulled-her-knowledgeable-professor-alexia-thomas-demands/

https://www.frenchentree.com/living-in-france/culture/eu-citizen-voting-rights-in-france/

Globalism-Helping 3rd World Populations Through the UN?

May 6, 2017

After World War II, the United Nations (UN) was founded. Among the many programs under the UN, is to stop world hunger, education for all children, family planning, global population and the list goes on. The monies to help these third world countries comes from nations that are already developed and at one time were prospering. But, due to the heavy burden of sustaining third world countries who are forever dependent on us, we are growing poorer with each passing decade. Taking on more debt is going to sink the USA.

Instead of the Red Cross and other humanitarian aid agencies relying on monies collected through gifts, it wasn’t enough to bring the third world countries out of poverty. Under the UN, tax payer dollars from all member nations have been contributing to help these third world countries.

This aid has been going on for over fifty years. So, why are there still third world countries? Most of the under-developed countries have tribes that are living in isolated regions of the world and do not welcome modernization. They are not interested in education, and most definitely not equality of man and woman. They live their own traditional values, handed down for 1000’s of years. To forcefully modernize them would be catastrophic to some third world countries. A good example of what I am trying to say, look at the American Indians, we forced religion, our ways of living, took their lands…herded them onto reservations! Exactly what were our intentions to the American Indian? Yeah, we were really great trying to modernize them! NO, we had no right to do what we did!

After World War II the need for developed nations to form alliances with third world countries grew. These powerful nations reached out to these third world countries to receive their alliance and in return received our military support, economic developmental support…and this has been going on for a very long time, Nothing has changed drastically for these third world countries, as they still are third world countries.

After all this time and money received from wealthy nations, you would think these countries would be more developed. But, this simply is not the case. Many are still so impoverished that they depend on foreign aid till this day. Many of these countries have become dependent on foreign aid, with no outlook in site of being able to stop the aid. Currently the global gap between rich and poor is greater than it ever was.

Food that is sent to, let’s say Africa or Asia may never get to the people who need it. Their government may be stopping the aid from ever reaching them, for whatever political reason. When the Apartheid was going on in South Africa, many blacks were kept from furthering their education in order to try and help themselves to move out of poverty. 

So, where is all the humanitarian aid monies going?

Doesn’t seem to me that the billions upon billions the USA gives is helping the third world countries, rather prolonging it.

When I see pictures of starving children with very bloated stomaches, this of course tears at your heartstrings. Whether it is famine or drinking bad water, which could also cause a very bloated stomach, it’s still very bothersome to me. But, how do we know for sure they are being helped? 

Another way some look at these pictures, in that they are being used as propaganda. It’s not outside the realm of possibility. Germans used this type of propaganda very well.

When I looked at some of the pictures of the children with the swollen bellies, how come the mother who was right there did not show signs of malnutrition or famine?

Clearly, the child on the far right was photoshopped into this picture:

I am not saying all pictures should be discounted, but some could be.

After the fall of communist Russia, North Korea took a hit because they traded heavily with Russia. The North Korean people actually went through poverty and starvation. Here is what a doctor proclaimed he saw happening: The excerpt comes from rense.com:

“The doctor found the North Korean people living in unspeakable misery. Reports of famine and flood damage had started to trickle out of this hermit kingdom in the early 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union, North Koreaís main trading partner. But even the grim rumors did not match the misery Vollertsen saw firsthand. Humanitarian groups such as CARE and Oxfam, and relief organizations including the World Food Program, sent food aid to North Korea for a time, but most withdrew when they were not allowed to make sure it went to the hungry and helpless rather than to friends of the regime.”

“Nobody really knows where such aid goes,” Vollertsen tells Insight in Washington, “except that it is not going to the ordinary citizens.” After working as a doctor in North Korea for 18 months, Vollertsen became convinced that the starvation was being aided and abetted by the government.”

“All visits for humanitarian groups are prearranged,” Vollertsen tells Insight. “The World Health Organization sees a room of children sitting in front of their cookies, they write a positive report and leave. I was an emergency doctor, nothing was ever prearranged, so I saw the reality of life for these people. They have nothing.” Vollertsen tells of visiting hospitals where food and aid reportedly had been sent the week before. Upon arrival he would find empty storage rooms and children with empty stomachs.”

So, here we have testimony that people’s own governments can cause their starvation.

Is the UN just another fraudulent foundation, except on a bigger scale? Are they building on wealth to take over the world? Hey, this isn’t without consideration here! Did you know that the Lucis Trust is the publishing house for the UN’s material that is published on the internet? Lucis Trust was established in 1922 as Lucifer Trust by Alice Bailey, as the publishing company to disseminate  the books of Bailey and Madame Blavatsky and the theosophical society. The name was changed one year later after much uproar over the name Lucifer.

I was hoping that our President would pull out of the UN when he took office. I see a foreseeable future where any humanitarian aid comes directly from individual countries of their own accord, not directed by a big conglomerate such as the UN? It’s just to easy to lose track of where the American’s money is going, without seeing it for ourselves. We want smaller government across the board, that’s the only smart way to go.

Sources:

http://jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/lucifer_trust.htm

http://rense.com/general11/unspeak.htm

Hillary Clinton Still Sending Mixed Messages, Spinning….

May 5, 2017

COMMENT/OPINION

According to Breitbart, At the Planned ParentHood Centennial Gala, Hillary Clinton is out and about touting the movie “Handmaid’s Tale,” in the hope of spurring on people not to give up on their abortion rights. Her feelings of course are very clear in her statement about abortion, in which she makes it very clear that anyone who wants to lead in abortion should understand that it is an issue of morality: 

“[A]nyone who wants to lead should also understand that fundamentally, this is an issue of morality.” Yup, guess you need to throw out any shred of morality you have in order to lead this group.

It is a morality issue for sure, what side of the fence do you want to be on in this campaign of hers? Personally I’m on the other side of the fence, far away from her corrupting ways. There are certain medical issues which could call for an abortion, but this is far and away from “abortion on demand.”

During her campaigning, Hillary claimed to be religious. On the Wikipedia page it claims she has been a life long Methodist. The Methodist view on abortion seems to be the same as other Christian religions: The following is an excerpt from umc.org:

“The topic of abortion is complex. The United Methodist Church affirms these two sentences in The Social Principles:”

“Our belief in the sanctity of unborn human life makes us reluctant to approve abortion.”

“But we are equally bound to respect the sacredness of the life and well-being of the mother”

“and the unborn child. (Book of Discipline ¶161.J)”

At this gala, they seemed to be sending a message that they are looking to rebuild the DNC after the drastic loss in 2016. There are some Democrats such as Senator Chuck Shummer who said, as reported by theatlantic.com, “the party is strongly “pro-choice,” but remains a “big tent party.” Nancy Pelosi said “of course” it’s possible to be “pro-life” and be a Democrat, you have the support of the Democratic Party. Tom Perez, the chair of the Democratic National committee, meanwhile is facing harsh criticism within the party for remarks widely interpreted as saying that Democrats who oppose abortion were not welcome in the party.

Hillary seems to be sending the same message as Perez as far as I am concerned. Her statement in leading says to me, make up your mind which side you want to be on, pro-life or pro-abortion?

Hillary Clinton sites a book, “HandMaid’s Tale,” which is a fictional writing meant to scare women, if you ask me. Whether it’s propaganda or not, the reader would have to decide. 

Funny thing is, the book talks about how religious groups are being annihilated and some have gone underground. This type of totalitarian government is what we were fighting by not voting for Hillary Clinton. But, she’s still spinning/mirroring even at the gala.

The author of this book, Margaret Atwood, talks about costumes worn in the book: “Many totalitarianisms have used clothing, both forbidden and enforced, to identify and control people — think of yellow stars and Roman purple — and many have ruled behind a religious front. It makes the creation of heretics that much easier.” What does that tell us about the Muslims that Hillary and Obama let in without proper vetting? Do they not control their women through clothing they wear? or genital mutilation?

Photograph of Margaret Atwood, taken by Damon Winter, New York Times (2009)So, what exactly is Hillary Clinton saying when advising, talking about this book? To me she is sending a lot of mixed and spinning messages meant to confuse women. Again, she seems to have gotten off track in what her message should be. I am sure the men of America feel forgotten, left behind since she doesn’t talk/reference them at all. Is she the original Amazonian woman?

Your comments are always welcome.

Sources:
http://www.umc.org/what-we-believe/what-is-the-united-methodist-position-on-abortion

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/pro-life-democrats-abortion-sanders-perez-party/524394/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/05/democrat-party-handmaid-abortion-industry/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner

Margaret Atwood explains what her book “Handmaid’s Tail” is about: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/books/review/margaret-atwood-handmaids-tale-age-of-trump.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.bing.com/search?q=what+is+handmaids+tail&qs=n&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=what+is+handmaids+tail&sc=4-22&sk=&cvid=AB52CED00CD843ABA2436CBD33B68F55

Chelsea Clinton Maybe Going To Trial

May 5, 2017

Came across a video that peaked my interest. Then I checked out the information which claimed that an arrest warrant had been issued for Chelsea Clinton.

Of course none of the mainstream media has said anything about this revelation, that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen either.

Back in May of 2016, the Washington Free Beacon reported on a wall street whistleblower/ Financial Advisor, Charles Ortel, claimed that the Clinton Foundation was a charity fraud. That was a year ago, but it doesn’t mean the information was not looked into. We all know how long Clinton’s email fiasco went on for.

According to the article from Washington Free Beacon: “According to Ortel’s reports, the contribution disclosures from the Clinton Foundation don’t match up with individual donors’ records. He also argued that the foundation is not in compliance with some state laws regarding fundraising registration, disclosure requirements, and auditing rules.”

Excerpt from Washington Free Beacon:

“Although Ortel has been a commentator for conservative outlets, his findings might not be easy for authorities to ignore. After spending decades working in mergers and acquisitions at some of Wall Street’s top firms, he has been an early whistleblower on financial irregularities at companies such as General Electric and AIG.”

This is very interesting and I recommend you read the article first before listening to the video.

Sources:

http://freebeacon.com/issues/wall-street-whistleblower-turns-scrutiny-clinton-foundation/

Wishful Thinking Evan Osnos! But, NO – Majority of Congress is Not Talking About IT….

May 4, 2017

COMMENT/CRITICAL OPINION

IN ANSWER TO NPR ARTICLE http://www.npr.org/2017/05/04/526857048/trump-s-fitness-to-serve-is-officially-part-of-the-discussion-in-congress?utm_campaign=freshair&utm_medium=RSS

Seems more like a wish that’s not going to happen. Funny that this man has insider knowledge that no other reporter has. 

In his article he states that under the 25th amendment they are discussing this in private. My question is what makes him privy to this information, what source? When I don’t have a source that makes it believable, it’s not credible.

Evan Osnos is correct in saying basically, that members of congress are not pursuing it at this time, in any way, shape or form, I might add. Surprisingly Trump has many that support him, so I know this is not true.

In reference to members not talking publically about impeachment, as it would cause Trump supporters to have a “rallying cry.” Of course we would all come to Trump’s defense. Unlike the liberal progressives violent rallying cries. We would peacefully show our support to the opposition, with no reason for a “perilous element,” as so stated. So, there would be no reason not to make it public.

In talking about “types of behavior, standards,” that would leed to impeachment, there are none to suggest impeachment. When we voted for Trump, we knew what we were getting. He won, which shows he has many supporters.

There was a lot of talk about Barack Obama’s impeachment also, how soon we forget! Nothing came of it! 

Judiciously speaking, people have their opinions as they did with Obama, but that is all it is…opinion and nothing else. Again, liberals crying in their beer.

For every doctor, psychiatrist, etc….that would come forward to testify to the mental health of a sitting President, there would be that many and more who would say he is mentally stable. So, let’s not get off track!

It is my opinion this is officially coffee room chatter coming from Democrats who just can’t accept that they loss and no more.

Keep fishing 🎣 Evan, maybe just maybe, you will dig up more gossip around the water cooler. Wish I could be that fly on the wall to expose you.

According to Wikipedia, Evan Osnos:

Evan Lionel Richard Osnos is an American journalist and author. He has been a staff writer at The New Yorker since 2008, best known for his coverage of China. He is the author of Age of Ambition: Chasing Fortune, Truth, and Faith in …

Where he works should explain it all!


We Definitely Have A Liberal Thinker In The White House

May 4, 2017

COMMENT/OPINION

Ivanka Trump’s true colors are beginning to show. She has privately fought with her father on many issues of his presidency, saying “where I disagree with my father, he knows it.” The policy she and her father were in most disagreement was preserving federal funding in “Planned ParentHood.” 

She on occasion didn’t speak out on Trump’s campaigning policies. Many individuals took this as a message she was not supporting him in certain campaign issues when he was campaigning. 

According to Politico, she chose to meet with many Trump haters early on. She and her husband Jared Kushner flew to Aspen, attending “Weekend with Charlie Rose,” an off the record gathering in which 90% of the invitees were Trump haters. Was she in agreeance with the liberals here? Or was she trying to bridge, smooth over differences? We will never know as this event was publicized as a family vacation.

Back in December of 2016, Ivanka summoned Al Gore to Trump tower. There was a discussion on “climate change.” President Trump early on had made his views on the subject known in several tweets:

“The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 6, 2012

“The weather has been so cold for so long that the global warming HOAXSTERS were forced to change the name to climate change to keep $ flow!”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 29, 2014

After the meeting Al Gore was questioned by the press, he stated “I had a lengthy and very productive session with the president-elect,”  “I found it an extremely interesting conversation, and to be continued.” “And I’m just going to leave it at that.” So, we can assume that Trump was still not onboard with the liberals view on climate change. 

It was another matter when Al Gore spoke to Ivanka about climate change. We know this because of what he stated on MSNBC:  “It’s no secret that Ivanka Trump is very committed to having a climate policy that makes sense for our country and for our world, and that was certainly evident in the conversation that I had with her.” So, this statement from Al Gore shows a different stance that Ivanka has from her fathers. She also never let it be known how she felt about climate change during Trump’s campaign, as she never publically acknowledged nor refuted her own stance.

Now we can see that she has her own views on climate change. According to newsmax, Politico’s Annie Karni cites a source close to Ivanka as saying she “wants to make climate change — which her father has called a hoax perpetuated by the Chinese — one of her signature issues.”

As reported by AXIOS, Ivanka is to meet with the Scott Pruitt, head of EPA at the White House before the crucial Paris Climate Meeting. This meeting will most likely be the deal breaker on whether President Trump will leave the agreement or go along with it. She wants to make sure the President hears all the facts before making his decision.

Climate change is not based on factual science, period. It is based on “reproducibility,” which is outside the principals of the “scientific methods,” as evidenced here by Chairman of the House Science Committee, Lamar Smith in an excerpt from sciencemag.org

“Next week we’re going to have a hearing on our favorite subject of climate change and also on the scientific method, which has been repeatedly ignored by the so-called self-professed climate scientists,” Smith told the Heartland Institute’s 12th annual conference on climate change in Washington, D.C. The audience cheered loudly as Smith read the names of three witnesses—climate scientist Judith Curry, who recently retired from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta; policy specialist Roger Pielke, Jr. of the University of Colorado in Boulder; and John Christy, a professor of earth system science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville—he expects to support his view that climate change is a politically driven fabrication and that taking steps to mitigate its impact will harm the U.S. economy.

Smith upon speaking at the climate doubters conference also made a distinction on whether the  belief that the evolvement of climate change was actually not “climate science,” but in fact was actually “climate studies.” Read more here

It is self evident that Ivanka thinks her father does not have all the facts on climate change. This is disturbing to me. He often reads, calls and summons of his own accord, without direction from an advisor. He is very capable of making his own judgements without his valuable time being taken from another liberal thinker who wants to pressure him into their own beliefs. Who’s President here anyway?

Actual scientist – Climate Change is a Scam:

Sources:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/12/why-did-al-gore-go-to-trump-tower/509771/
http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/761603?section=Politics&keywords=Ivanka-Climate-Change&year=2016&month=12&date=01&id=761603&aliaspath=%2FManage%2FArticles%2FTemplate-Main&oref=duckduckgo.com
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/ivanka-trump-climate-czar-232031
https://www.axios.com/ivanka-to-meet-epa-administrator-before-crucial-paris-climate-meeting-2392605333.html

A Premonition I Had About England – World War III

April 30, 2017

These governments had better get their stuff in order because it’s causing me to have nightmares. Sometimes I don’t sleep at all for two days. Then finally, so exhausted I actually pass out. Sleep comes, but it is another dreaded dream….

Most of my dreams I don’t remember. The ones that I do remember, in the most part have come to fruition. This dream I am going to tell you about is very disturbing. I am hoping with all my being that this dream never comes true!

 
Upon awakening from these dreams which transpired over about a 3 week period, I have written them down. Not all the events are in chronological order, sometimes I get bits and pieces. I try to decide where they fit and put them into order in which I can write about it. Sometimes they are so disturbing that I wake up, and try to write down what I remember.

A revolution and war are coming, but it doesn’t start here in America. It will all start in England and North Korea. Russia is a tyrant in my dream!

England will have a formal EU breaking, but this….they will find out, will not solve most of the people’s most important issues. They will want more. They want a constitution like the USA. They most definitely don’t want globalism.

There will be demonstrating in front of (of all places) Buckingham Palace! The signs they are carrying are about taxation. They are meeting in pubs to talk about furthering their cause. They are upset with the monarchy and government for some reason. Maybe it’s an economic problem, since they had those taxation signs I saw.

They have their own right wing, left wing problems which will result in some deaths in front of the palace. I saw this. 

There are machetes being used during some type of riot, they are of Muslim origin wielding these weapons. The police, Interpol, security are caught off guard. It was a horrible scene to watch unfold. Many will perish, many will be imprisoned. The English flag was drooping, that is a sign to me of unrest, distrust, falling of a government.

Queen Elizabeth II, will die before the EU is passed formally. I am assuming this since I see King William. When I see William his father is always there. I attribute that connection to William, being heavily advised by Prince Charles.

Economic problems are becoming very bad. I see monster looking things stealing young children from their homes! People are stealing food to stay alive. Businesses are closing, store fronts and homes are completely dark at night. Banks are not open, and the ATM’s don’t work. The people are rising up against the government. 

I see a boat leaving England’s shore.  On this boat is the King of England. I would of expected to see him on a ship, not a sail boat. I did not see any of his family with him. He is now without a country, a type of self exile. He sails to America. I know this because I saw him with President Trump. They are talking about drawing support to get his crown back. 

All the monarchies agricultural lands, palaces will revert back to the people. I saw this.

 The people of England are turning on the English government and monarchy. There are meetings at parliament that turn very ugly quickly – yelling, pushing, chanting “treason.”
There are U.N. soldiers trying to help keep order. They take some people away. I don’t know where they are taken. They have become more important than the police.
I see Russian troops occupying part of England, as they close in. There is to much strife among the English people, they can’t pull it together, it looks like. America can’t come to their aid for some reason. It doesn’t look like they will win this war. Russian troops, weapons are so much more devastating. Where is the USA?
I see England as a divided country, much like Germany was after World War II.

 Other countries are at war also, North Korea has fallen, their regime is dead. Japan has withstood a nuclear attack. It is devastating, dead bodies were everywhere. Strange that the bodies were no where near the blast. The explosion has evaporated everything near the blast. Where there were buildings, there is nothing, just dark clouds, looks like snow falling. Japan has now withstood two very devastating bombs in two wars.

This is all I have for now. Some people have asked me if I dream in color? My answer is yes I do. It is so real looking, as if I was watching from far away.

Is Freedom Of Speech In Danger?

April 30, 2017

COMMENT/OPINION

Since President Trump has started working in the White House, and even before, numerous left and right wing news articles, with opposing views have repeatedly reported on that “Russian Connection,” then it was the “wiretapping” claim that Trump made. It never goes away apparently.

If your in the public eye, or somebody important, you are news, whether good or bad, fully factual or not. That is called Freedom of the Press. How often does the press receive 100% factual news? Are they always able to get it right all the time? The answer is no they don’t always have 100% of the facts all the time.

We have a President who has, at times been very unfairly reported on, sometimes being repeatedly carpet bombed, from the left wing propaganda machine news. We have referred to them as fake news, in return they refer to the right wing as fake news. It’s getting difficult to tell what is fake news and not fake. But, the decision making process should be left up to the recipient of that news, and at times it can hurt someone’s credibility, or character.

White House Chief of Staff, Reince Preibus told ABC News This Week, they have been looking into changing the libel law. Does this mean they are looking to sue? Probably. 

On February 25, 2017 according to pbs.org, Trump made this statement on Fox News, “I love free press, I think it’s great,” before adding “We ought to open up the libel laws, and I’m going to do that.”

We all know for a fact he has sued many companies and people in the past. Whether he was right or wrong in doing so, doesn’t matter, it is still his constitutional right to do so. At a rally in Fort Worth Texas, it was reported he stated “when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money.” 

Libel law as it stands now makes it very difficult to sue reporters or people who criticize you. In order to win a libel case you must be able to prove that factually incorrect statements that were made were done with malice or reckless disregard for the truth

President Trump has said that in order to change these libel laws to make it easier to go after the press, it would only be necessary for an act of congress. Others have argued, no, it would take a constitutional amendment. 

This is what Emily Doskow, Attorney at nolo.com has to say about public figures and celebrities who sue for “defamation,” another name for “libel:”

“Public officials and figures have a harder time proving defamation”
“The public has a right to criticize the people who govern them, so the least protection from defamation is given to public officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation and they must also prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.” 

“People who aren’t elected but who are still public figures because they are influential or famous — like movie stars — also have to prove that defamatory statements were made with actual malice, in most cases.”

Then there is a whole different ball game when it is “internet libel.” With laws under Internet libel, if there is proved defamation, it’s a felony in some states. In Colorado a man found guilty of libel received 23 years in prison. 

There are 17 states that consider internet libel a criminal offense according to dba-oracle.com:

“(Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin, along with Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands)”

President Trump has been quoted by foxnews.com as saying, “You don’t have to do a constitutional amendment. You need an act of Congress. I’m telling you — you need an act of Congress,” he said in an interview with Bill O’Reilly of Fox News last year.

Whether President Trump is right or wrong when it comes to asking Congress to make changes in the “Freedom of the Press.” All I know is that under Amendment 1 of the Constitution, it says, “Congress shall make no law….abridging the freedom of speech or the press.” 

I personally don’t think he will be able to make it easier to sue. It would take a constitutional amendment in my opinion. States have to follow libel laws/defamation laws in their sates. They are ruled on concerning individual cases, not all cases are the same. 

Anyone should be able to make an opinion on any politician. That is your Constitutional right.

I wrote my Congressman about clarification of the “wiretapping issue,” where our President claimed that Obama had him wiretapped. The news carried articles for months on this. The left reported their way, the right news sources were completely different in their reporting. I wanted to know exactly where Congress stood on the wiretapping issue. My Congressman did write me back, saying that Jeff Sessions wanted everyone to know that Trump was not wiretapped. That left me scratching my head in bewilderment. I guess we all need to draw our own conclusions. Congress can’t make us believe something we feel is contradictory.

Hang in there America, we have always had freedom of speech and freedom of the press, it’s not going to change now, I don’t care what the left or right says. WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION and a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE! Our founders were very smart in making Americans free, as some of them didn’t have this absolute freedom where they came from: (Why They Did It)

DON’T MESS AROUND WITH OUR CONSTITUTION!!!!

Sources:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_news/news_states_criminal_libel_web_internet.htm
http://www.heritage.org/constitution/amendments/1/essays/140/freedom-of-speech-and-of-the-press
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/02/27/trump-wants-to-weaken-libel-laws-amid-feuds-with-reporters.html


Russia Builds Nuclear Shelters For Its Citizens, USA? Not So Much….

April 29, 2017

If there was some type of nuclear apocalypse, don’t worry if your wealthy and have your own shelter, you’ve got it made. But for those less fortunate, you may be able to survive a nuclear catastrophe if you know how. When possibly surviving a catastrophic event, it depends on your location, how well you have planned for such an event and supplies you have on hand.

The Russians have never stopped making preparations for nuclear war, even after the Cold War. They have completed 5,000 emergency shelters in Moscow alone in 2012.

The Russians have a huge bunker in Mount Yamantau. This massive, expansive area (400 square miles in size) is said to be able to house 60,000 persons. It has a special filtration system in the event of nuclear, chemical or biological war. 

What about the Russians that live in the outskirts of densely populated cities like Moscow? They have taken care of that as well. 10-15 meters underneath most apartment blocks, shopping centers, sports complexes are easily built bunkers to accommodate them. The cost of this construction is around a half billion to a billion dollars, no small feat, for sure.

During October 2016, Russia had a drill in which 40 million people participated. They were instructed by state controlled television, NTV what to do in the case of nuclear war, stating: “If that should one day happen, each of you must know where the nearest bomb shelter is.” The statement was followed up with a video explaining what to do in case of this type of disaster. They even went as far to show school children putting on gas masks. 

The only system Americans have in educating the public is an alert system that would flash across your TV screen, stating where to go, what to do, where to tune into for information. For Americans it might help to know this information ahead of time since the timing is crucial. Since they haven’t told us where to go, nor what to do in the case of an emergency, I am assuming there are no provisions for most Americans besides the FEMA camps. There have been reports on the web about tunnels underground, beneath Walmarts. Could this be emergency sheltering for Americans?

In Japan and the U.K., since the end of 2016, the citizens there have been instructed to go to their civil defense website, retrieving a downloadable pamphlet which directs them in how to protect themselves in the case of a nuclear apocalypse.

The U.K., like the USA, does not have accomodations for most of the public in case of a nuclear disaster. They have bunkers dotted along the English countryside. But these bunkers are for specially trained officers who will send vital information across the country. According to dailystar.co.uk, only 1% of the citizens would be able to use left over bunkers, should they become available. The biggest shelter that the U.K. has is located in Burlington, Wilts, which could accommodate 100,000 people. But, only a fraction most likely would be housed there. During the Cold War citizens were advised to build their own shelters. Sound familiar?

In Japan, they have been preparing for evacuation since North Korea’s aggressive actions with failed missiles and continued nuclear threats. Japan has seen an increase in the number of personal bunkers being ordered. Normally one company called Shelter Co., would sell around five to six shelters a year. Now they have received at least 200 requests in the last month (since April, 2017) according to dailystar.co.uk. So, I guess those citizens are on their own also if such a catastrophic event should happen.

China has apparently constructed a huge bunker in Shanghai which could shelter 200,000 people. “The million-square-foot complex connects to shopping centers, office buildings, apartment buildings and the subway system via miles of tunnels, the Shanghai Morning Post said in an exclusive report,” as reported to us by churchofphiladelphia.tripod.com. So, again most people are on their own.

Now let me tell you about a luxury bunker that was built in Ector, Texas, as reported by the sun.co.uk. Each of the luxury bunkers (532 of them) connects to underground tunnel systems that leed to a community center, communal greenhouse and dry food storage. They also have room for golfing, spa, gun range, equestrian center, restaurants, shopping or water sports in 3 lagoons with beaches, all beneath a 700 acre plot.

The Rising S Company in Texas also manufactures bomb shelters. They start at £31,000 for a hotel room-sized haven to a luxury option that costs £6.6million which includes a gun range and bowling alley.

Well, it looks like us Americans will have to survive on our own, start preparing now if you haven’t already. There are several prepped sites out there on the web, check them out. Most of their foods are dry storage items, capable of a long shelf life. Remember to have enough water also.

If you have a basement in your home, that’s great, use it to your advantage. Make sure to stack mattresses up against any windows. 

Get your medications that you will need. 

Depending on how far you are from the blast will dictate how long you must stay in your shelter before you are able to leave it.

It doesn’t hurt to have a plan A and B now, hopefully we will never need it.

I will leave some sites at the bottom for you to check out.

http://foodforliberty.com/haven/?affiliates=43
http://m.wikihow.com/Dig-a-Bunker
http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/3-common-mistakes-avoid-building-bunker/
http://graywolfsurvival.com/2625/why-you-shouldnt-bury-a-shipping-container-for-a-shtf-bunker/
http://survivalcache.com/bug-out-bag/

My Take On Ivanka Trump’s Trip To Berlin, and Concerning Issues 

April 29, 2017

COMMENT/OPINION

When Donald Trump was elected President, to quote Barack Obama, that meant one President at a time right?

Looks like we have two people surrounding President Trump who could be very influential to some policies, changes that are different from what Trump campaigned for. One being refugees from countries such as Syria. At the the time Trump was campaigning, he seemed to understand and support people’s views on the refugee crisis. He knew that it was hard to vet most of these refugees. He knew we were concerned with some nefarious intentions some of the refugees could have against the US. ISIS, on several occasions made it known that they would infiltrate among the refugees coming into the United States.

During Ivanka Trumps trip to Germany she discussed the refugee crisis. It now seems there is a different stance by our President, which is a complete turn around on refugee acceptance here in the US, unbeknownst to me!

 Her father has not come out and informed the nation about a change in his campaigning promise to keep us safe. This threw me and many people on Twitter for a loop. This so called humanitarian crisis happened due to the Obama Administration trying to change regimes. Hillary Clinton, then head of the State Department, knowingly armed ISIS. This should of never happened in the first place.

This whole crisis has caused Germany and France, Sweden, Russia….(Complete list of terror attacks) great difficulties and heartbreak in dealing with mounting terrorist attacks. The USA has had its share of attacks also. I would hate to see our country end up like Europe.

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are very young and as far as I am concerned, both of them are inexperienced, not fit to advise/influence President Trump in any way about policy, here or abroad. President Trump should be getting his advice from his top military brass, Ambassadors, or others who are equipped to advise him properly. 

What does Ivanka’s or Jared’s resumes look like? Hmmm, let me see….real estate, owner of a business, yup, that just about does it, YOUR HIRED! Are you kidding me?????

When Ivanka was in Berlin, she should not of made the comment she did on Today about the humanitarian crisis. She was suppose to talk about women’s issues, economic empowerment! In the video, she was asked if Chancellor Merkel was using her as a back channel to the President? We all know what the answer to that question is. So, Ivanka most likely can persuade her father in affairs of state. She didn’t have the ability to steer away from the question she was being asked. My advise to the President, keep her in the USA! 

My next question is how much did this trip cost the US taxpayers, and was it really needed? Seems to me, Germany can have their own empowerment of women without our hand holding.

Talking about empowerment of women, is it empowering a woman when she only makes $1.00 per hour? It is my understanding that Ivanka’s clothing business is supported by contracted workers in China who make the clothes for her line. These workers, on average bring home about $62.00 a week. That’s not impowerment to me, that’s slave labor.

During Trump’s campaign she preached about empowering women, child care and a maternity leave plan. But, for her clothing line she does not pay her contractors for maternity leave, and neither does her father.

When Trump was on the campaign trail I was a little worried when his daughter was attempting to garnish more of the women’s vote for her father. At that time I wondered, shouldn’t he be speaking about these issues that were important to him about women? It wasn’t Ivanka that we were voting for. Now, it hits me, she was going to be part of the bigger picture. As we have seen, she has an office in the White House and has often sat in on her fathers meetings. One example is when she sat in on the meeting her father had with the Japanese leader.

Does Ivanka have a security clearance?

Right now, I am quite worried as to the continued use of President Trump’s children in the White House. Something needs to be done here! I am quite sure Ivanka does not need an office in our White House. She can champion her cause from somewhere else. Her cause is not an eight hour a day job!

A President does not need the day to day moral support of his kids! He can do just fine on his own. If he needs advisers, they should be real advisers. Ivanka and Jared can cheer him on, on the sidelines, so to speak.

When President Kennedy appointed his brother, Robert Kennedy as Attorney General, there was a big difference, he was qualified! He didn’t work in the White House, he didn’t sit in on meetings the President had with dignitaries.

The only time I can think of that a family was so involved with running a country, would be a King who is grooming his child. Such as the Romanov Dynasty.

I voted for Trump, I didn’t vote for his kids. I support our President, but when I see something that I don’t agree with, I’m not going to just sit there and say nothing.

What do you think?

 

Conjecture – Kim Jong-Nam’s  Assassination

April 28, 2017

As reported by 101 East, Kim Jong-Il had two illegitimate sons which the North Korean people were unaware of. Those two sons were Kim Jong-Un and Kim Jong-Nam. Both sons were kept out of the public eye.

As we know Kim Jong-Nam was assassinated on February 13, 2017. Both women assassins who were not North Korean were arrested and questioned. They both told authorities that they were hired, payed $100.00 each to carry out what they thought was a reality show prank.

Normally it is well known that the eldest son is the next in-line after their fathers death. Kim Jong-Nam Had fallen out of favor with his father Kim Jong-Il. He was apparently caught trying to enter Japan on a false passport to visit Tokyo Disneyland.

Kim Jong-Nam’s father sent him to China where he was living in exile under the name of Kim Chol. When his younger brother came to power, he purged family members, most likely to keep the secret. He did not want his legitimacy questioned. Very few people in North Korea know Kim Jong-Nam ever existed.

Kim Jong-Nam’s mother was a very popular North Korean actress, whom was married. If it became known that Kim Jong-Nam’s mother was already married it would of destroyed Kim Jong-Un’s “Godly status,” and that of his father’s legacy. The North Korean leader is looked upon as a Godly figure, without many blemishes to tarnish his life.

Quite interesting to note that Kim Jong-Un has never presented to North Korea his age, where he was born and grew up, what his mothers name is. The North Korean’s are kept in the dark.

Kim Jong-Un was very afraid that his brothers existence would become known in China which could most likely leak out to the North Korean people. The longer he lived in exile, and the many different countries he traveled to, besides becoming friends with several foreign media put his life in danger.

The London suburb of New Malden is home to over 10,000 Koreans, some 600 from the north. The Korean Association for Human Rights and Democracy is in New Malden. The Association is established by defectors from North Korea. As they are basically an exiled government, they looked upon Kim Jong-Nam to lead them. They felt that Kim Jong-Nam could be very persuasive to North Koreans. They approached him three times, the last time in Singapore in June of last year. Kim Jong-Nam expressly said he had no interest in North Korean politics. He stated he felt that the three generation Regime had to stop, that a revolution was the answer. 

They believe that Kim Jong-Un may have heard about the government in exile. Most likely it was reported to him by top officials. This most likely made him very nervous and paranoid.

The officials that Kim Jong-Un is surrounded by are left over from his fathers, and grandfathers regimes. It is very important for him to have their respect. Without the respect he would not be able to keep his place as the leader of North Korea.

All of this has not been proven, but the pieces of the puzzle sure do fit. Let me know what you think, and watch the below video, very interesting indeed!

Source: https://youtu.be/AHMiYmUooj8