Tag: Comey

Wow, Comey Had Already Decided Clinton’s Fate Before EMAIL Investigation Over

August 31, 2017

I remember when Comey came out and gave that strange speech to the public, completely exonerating Hillary in her email fiasco.

I thought wow, I can’t believe it! Then thought, how in the world could they have gone through all those emails in such a short span of time, not once, but twice! 

This tipped everyone off to the realization that something 🐠🐟was going on. Well, we were 💯percent correct!

Just saw a tweet from Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch President:

Now, when Tom Fitton, who is a lawyer says something like this, you sit up and take notice, you can virtually take it to the bank!

This comes from townhall.com, transcripts that were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee  today confirm that Comey had already decided to let Hillary off well before the formal FBI investigation was completed.

These transcripts were sent in a letter to the new FBI Director, Christopher Wray, the committee is demanding an explanation and also more documents that have to do with the case!

Do you think they will get more documents? Ty Clevenger, a reputable lawyer can’t even get FBI to release info under an FOIA request, stating not enough public interest.

We just might be getting to the bottom of this people👏, after all👏

Comey is going to be in some major trouble here, I am sure. Maybe he and Hillary will be cell mates.

READ MORE FROM TOWNHALL HERE> 

UPDATE: According to washingtontimes.com, U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the FBI to release more details about Hillary Clinton’s secret email account. 

The Grand Jury subpoenas for the internet service providers that compelled Clinton to testify are to be released to the public. This would give information to us about why they were issued in the first place and what information is on them.

The Trump Administration objected to these subpoenas being released to the public as they would violate the secrecy of the Grand Jury. The Judge overruled the administrations objection!

Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch kept warning us on Twitter that the Trump Administration was interfering  with his ability to get to the bottom of the Hillary Clinton Email scandal. Were the President’s hands tied? No! The President wanted the email case to remain closed since back in March, 2017! My question is why? My personal opinion is that we know Chelsea Clinton is best buddies with Ivanka Trump! This is not a secret!

So, you can understand Judicial Watch’s stance on the Trump Administration’s and DOJ’s stonewalling.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Tom Fitton has said, “They’re taking the same position as the Obama Administration on Clinton.” 

We have holdovers from the Obama Administration such as Justice Department lawyer Carol Federighi who opposes any discovery investigations from Judicial Watch or any other legal team, saying it is “moot” not revelatory since Hillary Clinton is not President!

I know Tom Fitton will not give up in the Benghazi or email scandal, the public has a right to know what they are keeping from us.

A Second Special Counsel Is Being Requested….

A Second Special Counsel Is Being Requested….

July 28, 2017

The House Judiciary Committee has sent a letter to the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions and the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, requesting a second Special Counsel to be appointed to investigate Loretta Lynch, among others.

Lynch directed then FBI Director, James Comey to call the Hillary Clinton Email fiasco a “matter,” instead of an criminal investigation. This mislead the public in a very negative way with her deceptive language.

The Judiciary Committee also points out that the evidence that Comey has given to them proves that Loretta Lynch may have used her position of power to undermine the Clinton investigation.

The Judiciary Committee has stated in the letter that they are concerned about the Wikileaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potential unlawful international dealings, including those from Russia and Ukraine….

Looks like Comey, Susan Rice, Ms. Samantha Power or others who had knowledge of the unmasking of individuals in Trump’s campaign team, transition team, may be brought into the Special Counsels investigation.

Remember that Russian Dossier that was proved fraudulent? Well, the House Judiciary Committee wants answers to this and the company called Fusion that Comey and the FBI were so bent on using. Whether or not there was any monies paid to this said company.

Looks like Comey might of been leaking information for a very long time, since they are requesting the Special Counsel to find out about any and all leaks originating from Mr. Comey and provided to author Michael Schmidt dating back to 1993.

Seems from this letter that the committee has been requesting answers for awhile now, they are tired of being rebuked, rebuffed and or ignored, they want answers, as does the American people.

Here are the questions in the letter they want probed by a Special Counsel: SCREEN SHOT OF QUESTIONS FROM LETTER

This is going to get very interesting, something that should of been the main focus for a very long time. I just hope that Hillary Clinton doesn’t get off and I hope the email investigation is reopened and justice is served. Comey is not the FBI Director that should be held in high regard since he was fired. He was fired with good reason as far as I am concerned.

7/28/2017 Renice Priebus has been replaced by John Kelly, a couple of days after this letter was sent to the AG and Assistant AG. Does this signal possible criminal prosecution for Prebius leaking information? 

Most of Trumps supporters were shocked when he appointed Renice Prebius as his Chief of Staff early on in 2017. Furthering proof of Prebius’s alignment with the Never Trumpers was documented in a memo by teapartypatriotscitizensfund.com:

Mr. Priebus participated in a meeting in NY as recently as mid-September of this year that consisted of anti and never Trumpers, including the advisors, donors and leaders of the stop Trump movement. Even as recently as that September meeting there was talk of an imminent Clinton win. Priebus did nothing to help Mr. Trump at that meeting, simply raising money for down-ballot candidates and sowing seeds of doubt. It is therefore not surprising that some in that meeting who are close to Ryan and Priebus are rumored to have leaked scandalous material about Mr. Trump in October, just before the election.

Way back then he was not showing allegiance to the RNC candidate for President.

If he was the White House leaker, he needs to be held accountable, questioned by the second Special Prosecutor as to what were his motives for leaking. They sure weren’t the motives of a man helping his President.

That brings me to mention the Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, will he be the next to go? President Trump cannot fire the speaker, but if he has been found to be a leaker, that will be a possible resign or face possible impeachment by the House.

As John Kelly has been appointed as Chief of Staff, Elaine Duke is to take up the position of acting Director of Homeland Security as reported by Fox News Politics.

I will update this page as more information is released.

Featured Image: http://americandailypatriot.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/comey-and-lynch-696×365.jpg

Can Trump Fire Mueller Without Firing Sessions? YES HE CAN

July 25, 2017

According to lawnewz.com, President Trump can fire Mueller for just causes besides firing the DOJ AG, Jeff Sessions. Simply by repealing the rules for Special Counsel Regulations.

Trump could argue that the Congress overstepped its authority by coming up with said Special Counsel rules, saying it’s actually unconstitutional. READ MORE BY LAW NEWZ

So, if that’s what it takes to get Mueller relieved of his duties, so be it! There should of never been a Special Counsel appointed in the first place. James Comey testified he hoped by him leaking the then notorious memo, a Special Counsel would be appointed. This was accomplished with clear wrongdoing on Comey’s part, to cause in effect a false implication of the statement, twisting of the facts to procure a Special Counsel. The memo if you remember was taken out of context, it is a clear case of manipulating a supposed statement.

Legal definition of a false statement which was written in Comey’s memo, meant to misconstrue the facts, hence the Special Counsel:

“False” may mean untrue or it may mean designedly untrue, implying an intention to deceive. When applied to the representations of one inducing an act to another’s injury it implies a purpose to deceive.”


A false statement or representation may be made orally or in writing, and may be a positive statement as well as silence or concealment of a material fact.”

Now, if President Trump does fire Mueller, the far left has said there will be riots in the streets.

I hope the leftists are aware that President Trump could declare martial law if things escalate massively, thus making him President for more than eight years! Do they want that? I didn’t think so, ANTIFA better beware!

FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS A REACTION

What does Trey Gowdy think about Sessions staying in his appointed position as DOJ Attorney General? Listen…..



Photo Credit, https://rightpatriot.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Trump-Mueller.jpg


Clinton’s Problems Continue, Trump’s Problems Unfounded

Clinton’s Problems Continue, Trump’s Problems Unfounded

June 15, 2017


Seems like the mainstream media is still pushing their “obstruction of justice” claims against the President. This is much to do about nothing! This is all coming from the Clinton allies, in a last ditch effort to save their own hides.

The MSM still won’t tell you that Hillary Clinton is still under investigation, they throw you off with fake news about President Trump. The Hillary Clinton investigations are warranted, says Senator Dianne Feinstein. These new revelations came out in James Comey’s testimony on June 8, 2017.

These revelations are not actually new, as most Americans believed that both the FBI and DOJ were protecting Clinton. Now, Democrats are listening to calls from ranking Senators like Feinstein and Grassley.

Feinstein believes their just might of been downplaying of the investigation into Clinton during the 2016 election. Comey testified that AG Loretta Lynch told him to say it was a “matter,” instead of a criminal investigation into Clinton. Comey testified that Lynch’s request made him feel queasy. Now, Feinstein is getting queasy to learn what Lynch asked Comey to state, enough to ask the Judiciary Committee for an investigation as she stated on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I think we need to know more about that, and there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

Feinstein also said she didn’t know whether Trump’s statements to Comey on the Russia probe, as relayed by the former FBI director, constitute obstruction of justice.

Senator Chuck Grassley is asking the State Departments, Rex Tillerson to investigate Hillary Clinton’s alleged misuse of power during her tenure as Secretary Of State. He reiterated back in 2015 that it had nothing to do with politics, but it was a matter of national security, this has never changed! He’s right, it is a national security issue!

The “obstruction of justice,” claim for the President will definitely not stick, as it was not an order by the President, as such it absolutely could not be misconstrued as an order. Flynn was still under investigation after Trumps talk with Comey, as he is to this very day. What must be emphasized here, which the MSM refuses to say, Trump is not under investigation for Russian ties. 

Further evidence for unprovable obstruction of justice claims for the President, the letters that were released by AG Sessions, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein proved Comey  was removed due to not upholding the rule of law, which could amount to obstruction of justice being drawn up against Comey. It is the President’s constitutional duty to make sure the rule of law is upheld and faithfully executed. 

As far as I am concerned a motive beyond faithfully executing the law which is not obstruction of justice, would be to hard to prove with evidence such as the letters. Another point to make since Comey’s firing, guess what? The Flynn investigation is still ongoing! There’s no obstruction of justice.

Hillary Clinton was obstructing justice by destroying cell phones, using bleachbit on emails…..This is clearly a double standard, one in which she finally will be brought to justice since Comey is no longer the Director of the FBI. 

By insiders or outsiders unknown at this time, leaking information that Mueller is investigating the President for obstruction of justice or the supposed Russian ties that his son-in-law, Jared Kushner had, it has been warned by Rosenstein that the leaks coordinated anonymously should be received with skepticism. In other words, don’t take it as fact. The Washington Post and CNN are known quite well for reporting, using anonymous sources. In my opinion this tactic to get a rumor started to thwart/hinder progression within the administrations duties to the American people. 

The firing of James Comey was because of the handling of the Clinton investigations. Feinstein and Grassley are the ones who are smart enough to figure it out after the Sessions and Comey testimonies.

This post comes from democraticunderground.com, posted by riversedge, 12 hours ago:

“Grassley is going after Hillary Clinton also in his probe to investigate Comey firing…….”

“Damn. I was happy when I found out Grassley committee was going to look into the Comey firing but did not know that part of the deal was to look AGAIN at the Hillary’s email witch hunt. Damn!!”

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/senate-judiciary-comey-clinton-email-239567

Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate Comey firing, Clinton email probe 

By Seung Min Kim 

06/14/2017 06:08 PM EDT 

“The Judiciary Committee has an obligation to fully investigate any alleged improper partisan interference in law enforcement investigations,” Grassley wrote to his Democratic counterpart, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California. “It is my view that fully investigating the facts, circumstances, and rationale for Mr. Comey’s removal will provide us the opportunity to do that on a cooperative, bipartisan basis.”

In the letter, Grassley also stressed that the committee is obligated to look into the Justice Department’s handling last year of the probe surrounding Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail use, citing Comey’s testimony last week that he was concerned DOJ “could not credibly complete the investigation and decline prosecution without grievous damage to the American people’s confidence in the justice system.”

“There should be no improper interference with FBI investigations to favor any elected official or candidate of either party,” Grassley wrote to Feinstein. “The Committee has an obligation to pursue all evidence of such misconduct.” 
Grassley and Feinstein met late Tuesday to discuss the Russia matter following testimony from Attorney General Jeff Sessions before the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to a Grassley spokesman. The Judiciary Committee has oversight of the Justice Department and the FBI.

Grassley stressed that the committee is obligated to look into the Justice Department’s handling last year of the probe surrounding Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail use.

After this investigation is completed, we will finally have an end to the Trump allegations of any obstruction of justice. But, Hillary will still be under investigation, the truth will come out.

Obama’s Not The Only One Dodging Process Servers, Comey Is Too!

Obama’s Not The Only One Dodging Process Servers, Comey Is Too!

June 9, 2017

The best news to come out of the Comey testimony at the Senate Hearing on June 8, 2017, was the wonderful, total vindication that there was no Russian collusion between Russia and President Trump. The President had tweeted that there was no collusion, most of us believed him, as did I. The dumb dumbs who followed New York Times, Washington Post still believed there was collusion. Comey blew that story of New York Times right out of the water. He said Trump was never under investigation! 

Larry Klayman who founded Freedom Watch has been trying numerous times to serve “Obstruction of Justice” complaint papers on Mr. James Comey, former FBI Director.

President Trump promised to drain the swamp, these dodgers of the law should just be locked up, enough with the peaceful process servers!

I guess it’s time for that Representative Al Green to sit down and reconsider his racist move of filing articles for our President’s Impeachment. Hey, Green your articles aren’t worth the paper they are printed on! All lies!

As for Senator Warner, you are not judge and jury, your just a Senator who is suppose to be representing truth and justice for Virginian’s. Your reply email to me was a lie, Trump and his campaign staff were being illegally surveilled. Not to mention all the Americans who are being illegally surveilled.

If you are reading this and are concerned about this illegal surveillance, then contact your representatives and tell them you want it stopped! Our voices can be heard, only if we act!

One very important note here, since the Climate Change Agreement was turned down by our President, which was in America’s best interest,  that he made this move, California’s Governor, Jerry Brown has signed an agreement with China on Climate Change. Yup, good old Brown, that traitor and chief of CA! Thinks he is the President! Well, actually it’s against our Constitution under Article 1, Section 10, which states; No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. 

President Trump, in my opinion is doing a great job, I know he will fight for America. 

In conclusion, stop reading the New York Times, Washington Post, they are only feeding you propaganda and lies. Their strategy comes right out of communistic books. Their best interests are not in our best interests.

Source of image is from https://theconservativetreehouse.com/

Have Seth Rich Murderers Already Been Apprehended?

Have Seth Rich Murderers Already Been Apprehended?

May 30, 2017

Are they lying to us about the capturing of Seth Rich’s murderers? According to a report from whatdoesitmean.com, they have already been apprehended on July 12, 2016.

The suspected murderers were, 19-year-old Keyante Edwards, 26-year-old Alpha Jalloh and 20-year-old Keith Jones. All records of their arrests have since been deleted. 

Alpha Jalloh was arrested in 2015, being connected to an international car theft organization operating in New York, New Jersey. Jalloh upon his arrest was reported as age 18, when in fact he wasn’t, he was actually older. He was released suspiciously soon after his arrest.

It was through electronic surveillance of Jalloh and his possible position as an FBI informant that raised suspicions of the death of Seth Rich. It was learned through this surveillance that he had been in contact with Hillary Clinton’s campaign office in New York as well as the DNC headquarters in Washington D.C.

The article goes on further to explain that Seth sent those emails to Wikileaks through an “alliance/partnership” with the German-Finnish internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom. Further reporting suggests that their was a secret meeting which was almost thwarted. 

It was further reported that FBI Director James Comey arrived at the secret meeting before CIA Director Pompeo to begin negotiations in New Zealand 🇳🇿. Kim did not want to meet with just Comey unless Pompeo was there also. It is said President Trump became so outraged at this backstabbing, he fired Comey.

Soon after this meeting that went bad, a kill order contract (worth 82,900 bitcoins) now worth over (198 million) has been issued against our President. This all was discovered through an intercepted, highly coded dark web conversation held between approximately 5 co-conspirators in the U.S. Intelligence communities. As referenced by the following communications which were held on Wednesday, May 17 at 2:31pm – 3:15pm.


Codes used in this “dark web” “Deep State” exchange include: “RR” for Robert Mueller, “MF” for Michael Flynn, and “Limey” for Christopher Steele, a former British MI6 intelligence officer

Wow, we need to talk with Kim Dotcom! Now it makes sense why they told the police to stand down. The deep state is covering up a lot it seems.

Source:

 http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2305.htm

Now A Special Prosecutor, So What Exactly Do We Know That Trump And His Campaign Have Been Tied To?

May 17, 2017

With all the mixed reporting from all the MSM, it’s becoming very hard to sift through what is fact or not. Even considering Congress and the Senate their biases are showing. They are ready to impeach President Trump before a complete investigation has been accomplished.

There is one main character that is being drawn into the sea of muck and that is our President. This whole investigation does not cover Trump as much as it does his campaign staff that surrounded him. But, when you listen to the Democratic/leftists it’s all about Trump. No, Trump did not ask Russia to find Hillary Clinton’s emails, it was a joke! He probably should not of said it, but that’s our President, he meant nothing by it, because he said “it’s probably not Russia,” when making this statement. The [VIDEO] can be watched here about the statement he made during a campaign.

These statements he made then implicates him in the investigation. The statement, “write it and regret it” can be said for “say it and regret it.” It’s true, you have to be careful with what you say and write, it can be held against you. Then again, they have to prove, without a reasonable doubt that he had some nefarious actions with Russia.

WHY A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR SO EARLY IN THE INVESTIGATION? 

The “Special Prosecutor, former FBI Director, Robert S Mueller, III, has been appointed to investigate the possible collusion between campaign staff and Russia in the meddling of the 2016 election. There will be an investigation to find out if crimes were commited during the election.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein statement:

“My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that prosecution is warranted,” Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein said in announcing the appointment. “I have made no such determination.”

So, we know that so far they are only investigating, they may not find any probable cause to move forward with a trial. 

He also said that a special prosecutor was needed so that confidence within the American people would be maintained.

“The public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.”

President Trump on many occasions has said that there was no collusion going on between his campaign and any foreign entity.

“As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know – there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity.”

Many people feel that Trump should not have fired James Comey because they assume he was fired to stop the Russian investigation. But let me clear this up right now, he had stated that he fired Comey because of the way he handled the Hillary Clinton email case. 

Most of us were appalled at the determination, possible coverup not to proceed with a criminal trial for Hillary. Actually, we all felt deep down she would be let go, you could see this early on in the investigation when Hillary kept saying she never emailed any classified material, when evidence was pointing to the fact she did. Did she know she would be cleared, and was trying to erase the whole fiasco from her supporters minds by making that false statement? Comey seemed to be protecting her from indictment during his most unusual press briefing. May I remind everyone he said no judge would even try this case, are you kidding me? Does he have the right to make that judgement? On with the show….

Comey did confirm that a Russian investigation was proceeding/ongoing. We all remember the infamous “Russian Dossier,” that John McCain passed onto then FBI Director James Comey. Yeah, good old John McCain! This was suppose to show some secret negotiations going on between Russia and Trump. To date the verification of these documents has not been proved. This is the only possible thing that could, I say could, link Trump to the investigation that I know of. Keep in mind, we don’t know if this Russian Dossier is verifiable. 

The Trump team has consistently denied any contacts with the Russian government. I personally think our government believes that Trump could be blackmailed through his business, financial dealings in Moscow. But, is this reason enough to impeach him? No, he hasn’t done anything wrong. He is a strong leader with only one thing on his agenda, Making America Great Again.


Then we have the Russian Banks that Trump has supposed connections with, specifically they are saying he had a server in Trump Towers connected to SVB Bank and Alfa Bank.

Per heatst.com, Bradley P Moss, a National Security Lawyer had told Heatst.com that he could see where a candidate could become “agents of influence,” vulnerable if you will. But, this still is just speculation, nothing else.

The following is what Moss told Heatst.com:


Now we have a “Memo,” where Trump supposedly asked Comey to let the Flynn investigation go. This, I don’t believe is evidence enough to convict/indict. Even if it does go to trial, the nature of the supposed memo does not demand Comey to stop the Flynn investigation.

As of 2:45p.m., 5/17/2017, according to yahoo.com, “The Republican chairman of a House oversight committee says he will ask former FBI Director James Comey to testify at a hearing next week that will look into whether President Donald Trump pressured Comey to shut down an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.”
As reported by yahoo.com, At 2:30 p.m., 5/17/2017, “Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee say they expect the panel to ask ousted FBI Director James Comey to testify to Congress.”

We will see what Comey says and if he has the Memo in order to make a determination on these accusations. If he kept memos on Trump, I am sure he kept them on the Hillary Clinton email investigation also. People are discussing Comey’s note taking as a “culture of the FBI.” So, he must have very interesting notes on Hillary? If he doesn’t have memos on Hillary, something very funny is going on here!

POSSIBLE PEOPLE UNDER FBI INVESTIGATION

In the following paragraph I am only relaying what mainstream media (MSM) has previously detailed in their articles. This does not mean they are guilty of collusion with Russia, nor does it mean they are definitely under investigation. We don’t know who is under investigation since FBI has not told us. 

We know that Flynn stepped down for possible connections with Russia, when he supposedly talked with the Russian Ambassador, Sergei Kislyak before the Presidential transition.

Attorney General Sessions who was Trumps Policy Advisor during the campaign, may have possibly had meetings with the Russian Ambassador, supposably not disclosing this information prior to his confirmation hearings.

Carter Page who was an earlier Campaign Advisor for Donald Trump was scrutinized by the FBI for possible communications with Russian officials. He was said to of travelled to Moscow in December, 2016.

Paul Manafort was said to of written Billionaire Oleg Deripaska in 2005, proposing to do work for Deripaska that would benefit the Putin government.

Michael Cohen, who is Trump’s lawyer, is being accused of speaking with a Ukrainian lawmaker, Andrii Artemenko, who told CNN about some type of pro-Russian peace plan which he wanted Cohen to deliver to the Trump Administration. Cohen’s in-laws are Ukrainian, but I don’t see what difference that could make.

According to Fox News, Jared Kushner talked supposedly with the Russian Ambassador before the inauguration in order to build relationships, ultimately paving a way to a smoother transition into the White House. He could be considered the person of interest that investigators are looking into, who is closest to the President.

Just because they talk to foreign leaders, it does not make them an instant traitor. In early May, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov met with President Trump here in the USA and spoke about a classified subject concerning terrorism. This became a big deal, stretched way out of proportion, as many Democrats thought he should not of talked about it. I am sure these politicians are aware that, the President has the broad authority to declassify documents.

Terrorism is a worldwide problem and Russia is a part of trying to help solve this ongoing problem. I don’t see anything wrong with what he does in talks, he is simply trying to further peace around the world by ending terrorism.

Maybe instead of freaking out all the time the Democrats as well as the non-Trumper’s and MSM could give him a chance to lead, they might be surprised, if only they could work with him and stop micromanaging his every move. Hillary Clinton and her minions need to go back into the woods, stay there!

So, this is all we know, we will have to trust the special prosecutor in getting to the bottom of all the confusion. They are all not guilty, until and if, an indictment comes about which would bring forth an ensuing trial, therefore deciding the case.

As far as an impeachment of the President is concerned, ain’t going to happen, the left can keep dreaming!



Sources

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-1495058507-htmlstory.html
Image: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-business.html?_r=0&referer=https://duckduckgo.com/
Image: https://heatst.com/world/exclusive-fbi-granted-fisa-warrant-covering-trump-camps-ties-to-russia/

De Facto Memo – Why Would Trump Ask Comey to Let The Investigation of Flynn Go?

May 16, 2017

COMMENTS/OPINIONS

According to the New York Times, In February President Trump asked ex-FBI Director James Comey to shut down the investigation of Michael Flynn. Apparently after meetings with President Trump, Comey would write notes/memo about what they discussed.

New York Times admits they have not seen this unclassified memo. Part of this memo was shared by one of Comey’s associates with a Times reporter:

“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Comey, according to the memo. “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

This memo, if it exists, never demanded to let Flynn off. It just seemed to express his personal feelings on the matter.

The White House says that this is not what the President said. I am going to give Comey the benefit of the doubt here. Maybe Comey wrote what he thinks the President was trying to communicate to him.

In the matter of evidence to be admissible in a court of law, records need to be shown as reliable. If it is felt that the memo is not reliable, this of course could be an issue to be argued. The legal definition of reliable is: accurate, authentic, exact, proved, genuine. A recording would of sufficed as proof, but there is not one. What if Comey just composed a memo which was in fact not what was discussed? Hey, he’s done a lot worse until Trump fired him.

This is what the White House had to say:

“While the president has repeatedly expressed his view that General Flynn is a decent man who served and protected our country, the president has never asked Mr. Comey or anyone else to end any investigation, including any investigation involving General Flynn,” the statement said. “The president has the utmost respect for our law enforcement agencies, and all investigations. This is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and Mr. Comey.”

So, in Trump’s released statement, per New York Times, which in fact would be used as evidence supporting what Trump claims, when he states it’s not an accurate representation of what he said. It’s kind of like he said, he said, in which you have to make a determination upon believability.

I am really surprised that the mainstream media is wasting my time in reporting something that is not even worth reporting. If there was some grey area that was discussed, it’s up to Comey to relay that to the President. This is nothing more than a witch hunt and nothing more. Things that are discussed between the President and some of his security intelligence teams should be off the record.

Why would Comey be compelled to take notes of everything the President says to him? Trump has never given him reason not to trust him. Comey, as far as I am concerned, is not a credible person anymore since he let Hillary Clinton walk free.

Funny that this incident should came out today, and miraculously Hillary Clinton launched her “Onward Together” campaign within about the same time frame. Wasn’t it Hillary Clinton that once said “When they go low, we go high?” Think about that statement from Hillary Clinton for a moment. It could mean many things, but to me her objectivity is to keep him low with her infiltrating resistance team. Did she have anything to do with a possible trap? In my opinion, I wouldn’t put it past her or her cronies. But, I do smell something very fishy here, I tend to go with my instincts.

Good luck New York Times, your credibility is definitely faltering with me. Get a grip!

UPDATE 5/18/2017

It seems that Congressman Al Green has called for Trump impeachment. [VIDEO] CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT BY CONGRESSMAN AL GREEN, Democrat from Texas.

Source:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html?_r=0&referer=https://duckduckgo.com/

Hillary Clinton Email Case MUST BE REOPENED!

May 10, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

No doubt about Comey protecting and obstructing justice. His firing by our President has nothing to do with Trump, Russia investigation. I believe the Trump administration gave Comey enough rope, so to speak, to hang himself, before firing him. Trump was advised by both Sessions and Rodenstein to fire Comey.

Right now the most important case that congress should be looking into is Hillary Clinton’s obstruction of justice, as well as Comey’s. I have never witnessed such bungling, incompetence of a case in my life! Obama and Lynch are also part of this monstrosity of injustice.

The very few Congressman and Senators who support Hillary Clinton need to realize, wake up to the facts about her. Why are they not realizing that if the filth about Hillary Clinton had not come out, we truly would have another Hitler in power. We would never have forgotten her email fiasco, therefore no trust in the President, had she become President.

These representatives who still support her are not true Americans. They don’t want to hear the truth, they can’t handle the truth. They most likely, in my opinion, are just like her, corrupt and dishonest. How much more do we as Americans not know about these representatives who support her?

We were told early on that there were several cell phones of Hillary Clinton’s that were destroyed with a hammer, missing SIM cards… This all complicated the procedure when trying to get concrete evidence/proof of intention and a just ruling.

Judicial Watch has obtained new email records from State Department documents with 29 new email exchanges which were never before released to investigators. These emails are further proof that Huma Abedin herself sent classified material as well as detailed daily schedules about Clinton to Clinton Foundation officials, through her unsecured clintonemail.com account. Why would Clinton Foundation officials need to know where Clinton was at all times?

Judicial Watch also writes/reports:


“The emails show classified information was sent through the clintonemail.com account:”

“In a December 21, 2009, email, Clinton top national security and foreign policy staffer Jake Sullivan forwarded an email to Clinton’s unsecured email account containing classified information heavily redacted under FOIA exemption B1.4(D) – “Information specifically authorized by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy … Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources.” Clinton thenforwarded the email, concerning the climate change accord, from her unsecured email account to Abedin’s unsecured email account with the message, “Pls print.”

“And, on December 24, 2009,Clinton sent an unsecured email from HDR22@clintonmail.com to then-Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson. The classified email, asking Carson to “Pls review the memcon of my call w [French] FM Kouchener [Redacted].” Information in this message was blacked out using FOIA exemptions B1.4(B) – “Foreign government information” and (D).”

It seems more and more is being uncovered, more emails, more unsecured ways that information was sent. Comey and Lynch should never have closed this investigation. This shows complicity in helping to cover up the ensuing investigation
Hillary had said that she had turned over all emails, as far as she knew…..sorry, caught again! I believe people went through those emails and hand picked ones that were to be turned over, omitting ones they didn’t want turned over, and if so, are just as guilty as Clinton. She could of hand picked them since there was an amount of time that passed from being told to turn emails back over to the State Department, and when she actually did turn it over. If you remember these emails had documents about Benghazi in them as well. So, when a subpoena was produced for Benghazi documents, David Kendall, one of Clinton’s attorneys informed the committee that Clinton’s emails from her time at the State Department had been permanently erased.

Also during the time the investigative committee was trying to get these emails, Clinton had asked for a two week extension, which they gave her.

As reported by Politico, “After seeking and receiving a two week extension from the Committee, Secretary Clinton failed to provide a single new document to the subpoena issued by the Committee and refused to provide her private server to the Inspector General for the State Department or any other independent arbiter for analysis,” Gowdy said.

Was she buying time? I think so

Also, may I remind everyone that AP reported on 6/22/2016, that the State Department was having such technical problems with Hillary’s at home server, they temporarily disabled security features on the government’s own system!! This information came out in emails that were released. So, what information was possibly hacked inside of the State Department when this was done?

Comey also stated that intent would have to be proved to find Hillary guilty of any charges. Seems like Comey was trying to rewrite the law. According to Dr. Gorka, who is Deputy Assistant to the President, “intent is irrelevant.”

Under “strict liability” there need not be proof of intent. “strict liability” definition

Who ever in the House or Senate thinks Comey’s termination was caused by the Trump, Russia investigation, GET A GRIP! He deserved to be fired!



Read More>

INTENT IS IRRELEVANT IN CLINTON’S EMAIL CASE: WATCH [VIDEO] FOX AND DR GORKA