Tag: Comey

Now A Special Prosecutor, So What Exactly Do We Know That Trump And His Campaign Have Been Tied To?

May 17, 2017

With all the mixed reporting from all the MSM, it’s becoming very hard to sift through what is fact or not. Even considering Congress and the Senate their biases are showing. They are ready to impeach President Trump before a complete investigation has been accomplished.

There is one main character that is being drawn into the sea of muck and that is our President. This whole investigation does not cover Trump as much as it does his campaign staff that surrounded him. But, when you listen to the Democratic/leftists it’s all about Trump. No, Trump did not ask Russia to find Hillary Clinton’s emails, it was a joke! He probably should not of said it, but that’s our President, he meant nothing by it, because he said “it’s probably not Russia,” when making this statement. The [VIDEO] can be watched here about the statement he made during a campaign.

These statements he made then implicates him in the investigation. The statement, “write it and regret it” can be said for “say it and regret it.” It’s true, you have to be careful with what you say and write, it can be held against you. Then again, they have to prove, without a reasonable doubt that he had some nefarious actions with Russia.

WHY A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR SO EARLY IN THE INVESTIGATION? 

The “Special Prosecutor, former FBI Director, Robert S Mueller, III, has been appointed to investigate the possible collusion between campaign staff and Russia in the meddling of the 2016 election. There will be an investigation to find out if crimes were commited during the election.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein statement:

“My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that prosecution is warranted,” Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein said in announcing the appointment. “I have made no such determination.”

So, we know that so far they are only investigating, they may not find any probable cause to move forward with a trial. 

He also said that a special prosecutor was needed so that confidence within the American people would be maintained.

“The public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.”

President Trump on many occasions has said that there was no collusion going on between his campaign and any foreign entity.

“As I have stated many times, a thorough investigation will confirm what we already know – there was no collusion between my campaign and any foreign entity.”

Many people feel that Trump should not have fired James Comey because they assume he was fired to stop the Russian investigation. But let me clear this up right now, he had stated that he fired Comey because of the way he handled the Hillary Clinton email case. 

Most of us were appalled at the determination, possible coverup not to proceed with a criminal trial for Hillary. Actually, we all felt deep down she would be let go, you could see this early on in the investigation when Hillary kept saying she never emailed any classified material, when evidence was pointing to the fact she did. Did she know she would be cleared, and was trying to erase the whole fiasco from her supporters minds by making that false statement? Comey seemed to be protecting her from indictment during his most unusual press briefing. May I remind everyone he said no judge would even try this case, are you kidding me? Does he have the right to make that judgement? On with the show….

Comey did confirm that a Russian investigation was proceeding/ongoing. We all remember the infamous “Russian Dossier,” that John McCain passed onto then FBI Director James Comey. Yeah, good old John McCain! This was suppose to show some secret negotiations going on between Russia and Trump. To date the verification of these documents has not been proved. This is the only possible thing that could, I say could, link Trump to the investigation that I know of. Keep in mind, we don’t know if this Russian Dossier is verifiable. 

The Trump team has consistently denied any contacts with the Russian government. I personally think our government believes that Trump could be blackmailed through his business, financial dealings in Moscow. But, is this reason enough to impeach him? No, he hasn’t done anything wrong. He is a strong leader with only one thing on his agenda, Making America Great Again.


Then we have the Russian Banks that Trump has supposed connections with, specifically they are saying he had a server in Trump Towers connected to SVB Bank and Alfa Bank.

Per heatst.com, Bradley P Moss, a National Security Lawyer had told Heatst.com that he could see where a candidate could become “agents of influence,” vulnerable if you will. But, this still is just speculation, nothing else.

The following is what Moss told Heatst.com:


Now we have a “Memo,” where Trump supposedly asked Comey to let the Flynn investigation go. This, I don’t believe is evidence enough to convict/indict. Even if it does go to trial, the nature of the supposed memo does not demand Comey to stop the Flynn investigation.

As of 2:45p.m., 5/17/2017, according to yahoo.com, “The Republican chairman of a House oversight committee says he will ask former FBI Director James Comey to testify at a hearing next week that will look into whether President Donald Trump pressured Comey to shut down an investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.”
As reported by yahoo.com, At 2:30 p.m., 5/17/2017, “Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee say they expect the panel to ask ousted FBI Director James Comey to testify to Congress.”

We will see what Comey says and if he has the Memo in order to make a determination on these accusations. If he kept memos on Trump, I am sure he kept them on the Hillary Clinton email investigation also. People are discussing Comey’s note taking as a “culture of the FBI.” So, he must have very interesting notes on Hillary? If he doesn’t have memos on Hillary, something very funny is going on here!

POSSIBLE PEOPLE UNDER FBI INVESTIGATION

In the following paragraph I am only relaying what mainstream media (MSM) has previously detailed in their articles. This does not mean they are guilty of collusion with Russia, nor does it mean they are definitely under investigation. We don’t know who is under investigation since FBI has not told us. 

We know that Flynn stepped down for possible connections with Russia, when he supposedly talked with the Russian Ambassador, Sergei Kislyak before the Presidential transition.

Attorney General Sessions who was Trumps Policy Advisor during the campaign, may have possibly had meetings with the Russian Ambassador, supposably not disclosing this information prior to his confirmation hearings.

Carter Page who was an earlier Campaign Advisor for Donald Trump was scrutinized by the FBI for possible communications with Russian officials. He was said to of travelled to Moscow in December, 2016.

Paul Manafort was said to of written Billionaire Oleg Deripaska in 2005, proposing to do work for Deripaska that would benefit the Putin government.

Michael Cohen, who is Trump’s lawyer, is being accused of speaking with a Ukrainian lawmaker, Andrii Artemenko, who told CNN about some type of pro-Russian peace plan which he wanted Cohen to deliver to the Trump Administration. Cohen’s in-laws are Ukrainian, but I don’t see what difference that could make.

According to Fox News, Jared Kushner talked supposedly with the Russian Ambassador before the inauguration in order to build relationships, ultimately paving a way to a smoother transition into the White House. He could be considered the person of interest that investigators are looking into, who is closest to the President.

Just because they talk to foreign leaders, it does not make them an instant traitor. In early May, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov met with President Trump here in the USA and spoke about a classified subject concerning terrorism. This became a big deal, stretched way out of proportion, as many Democrats thought he should not of talked about it. I am sure these politicians are aware that, the President has the broad authority to declassify documents.

Terrorism is a worldwide problem and Russia is a part of trying to help solve this ongoing problem. I don’t see anything wrong with what he does in talks, he is simply trying to further peace around the world by ending terrorism.

Maybe instead of freaking out all the time the Democrats as well as the non-Trumper’s and MSM could give him a chance to lead, they might be surprised, if only they could work with him and stop micromanaging his every move. Hillary Clinton and her minions need to go back into the woods, stay there!

So, this is all we know, we will have to trust the special prosecutor in getting to the bottom of all the confusion. They are all not guilty, until and if, an indictment comes about which would bring forth an ensuing trial, therefore deciding the case.

As far as an impeachment of the President is concerned, ain’t going to happen, the left can keep dreaming!



Sources

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-1495058507-htmlstory.html
Image: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/16/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-business.html?_r=0&referer=https://duckduckgo.com/
Image: https://heatst.com/world/exclusive-fbi-granted-fisa-warrant-covering-trump-camps-ties-to-russia/

De Facto Memo – Why Would Trump Ask Comey to Let The Investigation of Flynn Go?

May 16, 2017

COMMENTS/OPINIONS

According to the New York Times, In February President Trump asked ex-FBI Director James Comey to shut down the investigation of Michael Flynn. Apparently after meetings with President Trump, Comey would write notes/memo about what they discussed.

New York Times admits they have not seen this unclassified memo. Part of this memo was shared by one of Comey’s associates with a Times reporter:

“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Comey, according to the memo. “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

This memo, if it exists, never demanded to let Flynn off. It just seemed to express his personal feelings on the matter.

The White House says that this is not what the President said. I am going to give Comey the benefit of the doubt here. Maybe Comey wrote what he thinks the President was trying to communicate to him.

In the matter of evidence to be admissible in a court of law, records need to be shown as reliable. If it is felt that the memo is not reliable, this of course could be an issue to be argued. The legal definition of reliable is: accurate, authentic, exact, proved, genuine. A recording would of sufficed as proof, but there is not one. What if Comey just composed a memo which was in fact not what was discussed? Hey, he’s done a lot worse until Trump fired him.

This is what the White House had to say:

“While the president has repeatedly expressed his view that General Flynn is a decent man who served and protected our country, the president has never asked Mr. Comey or anyone else to end any investigation, including any investigation involving General Flynn,” the statement said. “The president has the utmost respect for our law enforcement agencies, and all investigations. This is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and Mr. Comey.”

So, in Trump’s released statement, per New York Times, which in fact would be used as evidence supporting what Trump claims, when he states it’s not an accurate representation of what he said. It’s kind of like he said, he said, in which you have to make a determination upon believability.

I am really surprised that the mainstream media is wasting my time in reporting something that is not even worth reporting. If there was some grey area that was discussed, it’s up to Comey to relay that to the President. This is nothing more than a witch hunt and nothing more. Things that are discussed between the President and some of his security intelligence teams should be off the record.

Why would Comey be compelled to take notes of everything the President says to him? Trump has never given him reason not to trust him. Comey, as far as I am concerned, is not a credible person anymore since he let Hillary Clinton walk free.

Funny that this incident should came out today, and miraculously Hillary Clinton launched her “Onward Together” campaign within about the same time frame. Wasn’t it Hillary Clinton that once said “When they go low, we go high?” Think about that statement from Hillary Clinton for a moment. It could mean many things, but to me her objectivity is to keep him low with her infiltrating resistance team. Did she have anything to do with a possible trap? In my opinion, I wouldn’t put it past her or her cronies. But, I do smell something very fishy here, I tend to go with my instincts.

Good luck New York Times, your credibility is definitely faltering with me. Get a grip!

UPDATE 5/18/2017

It seems that Congressman Al Green has called for Trump impeachment. [VIDEO] CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT BY CONGRESSMAN AL GREEN, Democrat from Texas.

Source:

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html?_r=0&referer=https://duckduckgo.com/

Hillary Clinton Email Case MUST BE REOPENED!

May 10, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

No doubt about Comey protecting and obstructing justice. His firing by our President has nothing to do with Trump, Russia investigation. I believe the Trump administration gave Comey enough rope, so to speak, to hang himself, before firing him. Trump was advised by both Sessions and Rodenstein to fire Comey.

Right now the most important case that congress should be looking into is Hillary Clinton’s obstruction of justice, as well as Comey’s. I have never witnessed such bungling, incompetence of a case in my life! Obama and Lynch are also part of this monstrosity of injustice.

The very few Congressman and Senators who support Hillary Clinton need to realize, wake up to the facts about her. Why are they not realizing that if the filth about Hillary Clinton had not come out, we truly would have another Hitler in power. We would never have forgotten her email fiasco, therefore no trust in the President, had she become President.

These representatives who still support her are not true Americans. They don’t want to hear the truth, they can’t handle the truth. They most likely, in my opinion, are just like her, corrupt and dishonest. How much more do we as Americans not know about these representatives who support her?

We were told early on that there were several cell phones of Hillary Clinton’s that were destroyed with a hammer, missing SIM cards… This all complicated the procedure when trying to get concrete evidence/proof of intention and a just ruling.

Judicial Watch has obtained new email records from State Department documents with 29 new email exchanges which were never before released to investigators. These emails are further proof that Huma Abedin herself sent classified material as well as detailed daily schedules about Clinton to Clinton Foundation officials, through her unsecured clintonemail.com account. Why would Clinton Foundation officials need to know where Clinton was at all times?

Judicial Watch also writes/reports:


“The emails show classified information was sent through the clintonemail.com account:”

“In a December 21, 2009, email, Clinton top national security and foreign policy staffer Jake Sullivan forwarded an email to Clinton’s unsecured email account containing classified information heavily redacted under FOIA exemption B1.4(D) – “Information specifically authorized by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy … Foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources.” Clinton thenforwarded the email, concerning the climate change accord, from her unsecured email account to Abedin’s unsecured email account with the message, “Pls print.”

“And, on December 24, 2009,Clinton sent an unsecured email from HDR22@clintonmail.com to then-Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson. The classified email, asking Carson to “Pls review the memcon of my call w [French] FM Kouchener [Redacted].” Information in this message was blacked out using FOIA exemptions B1.4(B) – “Foreign government information” and (D).”

It seems more and more is being uncovered, more emails, more unsecured ways that information was sent. Comey and Lynch should never have closed this investigation. This shows complicity in helping to cover up the ensuing investigation
Hillary had said that she had turned over all emails, as far as she knew…..sorry, caught again! I believe people went through those emails and hand picked ones that were to be turned over, omitting ones they didn’t want turned over, and if so, are just as guilty as Clinton. She could of hand picked them since there was an amount of time that passed from being told to turn emails back over to the State Department, and when she actually did turn it over. If you remember these emails had documents about Benghazi in them as well. So, when a subpoena was produced for Benghazi documents, David Kendall, one of Clinton’s attorneys informed the committee that Clinton’s emails from her time at the State Department had been permanently erased.

Also during the time the investigative committee was trying to get these emails, Clinton had asked for a two week extension, which they gave her.

As reported by Politico, “After seeking and receiving a two week extension from the Committee, Secretary Clinton failed to provide a single new document to the subpoena issued by the Committee and refused to provide her private server to the Inspector General for the State Department or any other independent arbiter for analysis,” Gowdy said.

Was she buying time? I think so

Also, may I remind everyone that AP reported on 6/22/2016, that the State Department was having such technical problems with Hillary’s at home server, they temporarily disabled security features on the government’s own system!! This information came out in emails that were released. So, what information was possibly hacked inside of the State Department when this was done?

Comey also stated that intent would have to be proved to find Hillary guilty of any charges. Seems like Comey was trying to rewrite the law. According to Dr. Gorka, who is Deputy Assistant to the President, “intent is irrelevant.”

Under “strict liability” there need not be proof of intent. “strict liability” definition

Who ever in the House or Senate thinks Comey’s termination was caused by the Trump, Russia investigation, GET A GRIP! He deserved to be fired!



Read More>

INTENT IS IRRELEVANT IN CLINTON’S EMAIL CASE: WATCH [VIDEO] FOX AND DR GORKA