Tag: DHS

Oklahoma Biological Weapons Test

November 14, 2017

This information comes from FOX23 News:

Usually tests that are performed are not suppose to endanger humans, but who knows what could go wrong? Some people seem very concerned…

FOX 23 News:

According to their article this test will occur in 2018 at the abandoned Chilocco Indian School.

The school which is now divided into different zones has a long background that goes back many years according to abandonedok.com. It is owned by the United States government and is heavily guarded 24/7 by armed federal police and a large pack of dogs, even to this day. It is used as practice and training grounds which is NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

Residents have been warned in an Oklahoma newspaper about the upcoming test and were informed that the chemicals released would be non-toxic.

This test is suppose to simulate a biological chemical attack by terrorists and will be carried out by Department of Homeland Security.

FOX23 Excerpt from article:

“For the particle test, the government plans to release titanium dioxide, which it describes as a “white odorless powder that is chemically insoluble in water, nonreactive, nonflammable and nonhazardous.”

“For the biological test, the government plans to release genetic, barcoded spores of an insecticide sold under the trade name of Dipel. Dipel is not considered hazardous by the Environmental Protection Agency when handled appropriately, according to an assessment.”

“The assessment said the test will have no adverse impact on human health or the environment.”

South Central Kansas, as well as the city of Arkansas itself seems very concerned as to the effects on citizens: Republican US Representative Ron Estes has a lot of questions concerning the safety: “I have numerous questions regarding this proposed test,” Estes said. “While it’s important for our federal agencies to test their abilities in response to threats, we need to be 100 percent certain this test is safe for the residents of south-central Kansas.”

So, it looks like before this event happens it will be watched closely.

Joe Arpaio Was Found Guilty, Simply Upholding USA Law, Now Promised Pardon

Joe Arpaio Was Found Guilty, Simply Upholding USA Law, Now Promised Pardon

August 27, 2017

As expected after President Donald Trump promised to pardon Joe Arpaio, the rhinos, like Paul Ryan came out in support of their views (open borders) that the law should not be upheld when it comes down to immigrants being in the USA illegally.

RHINOS ARGUMENT ABOUT NONCITIZENS

Yes, the Constitution does give rights to “We the people” within the USA territories. The Supreme Court has argued that not only do citizens in the USA have rights, so do noncitizens. The Constitution is often referred to as a “living document,” meaning it can always be interpreted by the powers that be.


This is why undocumented migrants are protected from being treated any differently than USA citizens, due to the Supreme Courts decision on interpretation of the Constitution.

This has given the undocumented immigrants authority to fight for “sensible immigration policies” in the USA.

A LITTLE BACKGROUND

When Joe Arpaio was Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona he was accused and found guilty of violating a 2011 temporary injunction, which two years later became a permanent order by US District Court Judge G Murray Snow. As reported by his attorney he was found guilty of contempt of a court order, worded in such a way to “stop acting like an immigration official” towards Latino immigrants who were possibly undocumented or here illegally. Before the pardon he was suppose to be sentenced on October 5, 2017. He was never found guilty of “racial profiling,” period! MSM has confused these facts and they need to retract all their publications saying he was. Watch [VIDEO] Arpaio’s Attorney Clears Up Racial Profiling That Was Misreported

President Trump told Fox News anchor Gregg Jarret in an interview about Arpaio:  “He has done a lot in the fight against illegal immigration, he’s a great American patriot and I hate to see what has happened to him.” This signaled to the public that the President was considering a pardon for Joe Arpaio.

It has been reported that Joe Arpaio has already been pardoned. I believe it is a “promised pardon” according to the letter dated August 25, 2017. As there is talk within the letter from Goldman to the White House Counsel of when the actual pardon should be filed with the court. Also, interesting to note that we still have White House leaks!

SCREENSHOT FROM SCRIBD.COM

The President of the USA has a right to pardon anyone he feels has been railroaded or wrongly accused and brought before the court system, except impeachment cases, just as the President before him. Least we forget that Barack Obama pardoned hundreds and commuted at least 1,715 according to en.m.wikipedia.org. Obama’s list of pardons from the Office of the Pardon Attorney can be found HERE IF INTERESTED.

According to az.central.com, Arpaio lost his bid for a jury trial. His guilty verdict was decided by US District Judge Susan Bolton. If he had a jury trial it was widely speculated that he would most likely have not been found guilty. Bolton had said that jury trials were not mandatory in a possible sentencing of six months or less.

Federal law for undocumented immigrants was given a respite under President Obama in 2011, where he ordered that undocumented aliens with only a felony criminal background would be considered for deportation, others would be considered for work permits. DHS said that it would only consider deportation for criminal background, national security, or public threat.

Arpaio’s attorneys argued that there weaknesses in the court order, confusing time when deputies should detain undocumented immigrants and exactly when they should be handed over to federal authorities.

Arpaio was upholding the law of illegal border crossings. That in itself is not wrong since ICE does uphold the law for illegal border crossings.

If you remember, President Obama’s sanctuary cities were almost a direct acknowledgement on the administrations position on illegal border crossings, especially from countries in Latin America. These Latin countries governments are as much at fault as the Obama administration, as they did not push what the “rule of law” was for illegal crossing here in the USA.

It is still illegal to cross the USA border, period. With Obama’s sanctuary city policies as they were and Latin Americans thinking that they would be given asylum, or some type of pass, that combined with not knowing the exact USA law, illegal immigration became one big out of control mess.

I am sure that Arpaio’s lawyer will file the necessary paperwork at the right time to pardon Arpaio! These stops that the deputies were making would never of happened if the rule of law was upheld in the first place. By Obama feeling sorry for and enforcing sanctuary cities, he by far sent the wrong message to other countries inhabitants trying to gain benefits and legal status within the USA.

Featured Image: wwsg.com

Sanctuary Cities Are Still A Big Problem…253 Illegal Aliens Set Free

April 1, 2017

OPINION/COMMENT

Declined detainers are becoming a big problem for ICE. Can you imagine, when you try and do your job, a job which difficult to say the least, is needed and appreciated among most Americans.  Only to be told by Law Enforcement Agencies that you can’t do your job, because they have declined the detainer. This is the most un-American position that these Law Enforcement Agencies take. 

New York is among the worst with their declined detainers, numbering 12 during 2/4-2/10.  4 were declined in Orange County, California, and 3 in Washington, D.C. According to newsmax.com, Clark County, Nev., and Nassau County, N.Y., are the top two on ICE’s list. Between Jan. 28 and Feb. 3 of this year, law enforcement in Clark declined 51 detainers while those in Nassau declined 38. The other counties listed declined less than fifteen.

ICE has listed 152 jurisdictions that have enacted policies, purposefully limiting their cooperation with ICE.  ICE has told the Agencies that they must ideally give 48 hours notice, letting them know when deportable illegal-aliens would be released.  Instead the Agencies just release them right back into their own communities. They also ask these Enforcement Agencies to keep these deportable aliens for at least 48 hours so that DHS can get there to pick them up. 

It must also be noted that among those states that do not cooperate are, of course, California and Connecticut.

Remember when President Trump signed Executive Order 13768  on 1/25/2017, he wanted to be kept abreast of deportables. Well, that list of Enforcement and Removal Operations is being compiled and soon it will be sitting on the President’s desk. I do believe there will be repercussions coming forth for the states who refuse to cooperate.

As far as the states that have set forth new laws like New York, which declared in 11/2014, that they would not cooperate/honor ICE detainers, well….sorry, you are not a separate country within the U.S.A. Federal law supersedes State law!

Source:
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/04/sanctuary-cities-free-253-illegal-alien-criminals-in-2-weeks/

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/779759?section=US&keywords=deportation-ICE-DHS-illegals&year=2017&month=03&date=20&id=779759&aliaspath=%2FManage%2FArticles%2FTemplate-Main&oref=duckduckgo.com